Week 6 Learning Activity: AACN Essential and QSEN Appraisal Purpose: The purpose

Week 6 Learning Activity: AACN Essential and QSEN Appraisal

Purpose:

The purpose of this assignment is intended to allow the student to show evidence of the following course objectives:

  • Articulate the methods, tools, performance measures, and standards related to quality, and apply quality principles within an organization
  • Compare how nurses improve healthcare access and quality
  • Synthesize ANA Scope and Standards of Nursing Practice, AACN Essentials, and QSEN Competencies to assure accountability for care outcomes

Description:

For this assignment, you are an advanced nurse practitioner caring for patients. You will write a 2-3 page (not including title page and reference pages) persuasive paper to your fellow colleagues explaining how to effectively engage patients as part of the healthcare team. Answer the following questions in your paper:

  • Why should the patient be part of the healthcare team?
  • How can you, as an APNP, engage in active patient engagement? How can your colleagues? Why should this be important to them?
  • What informatics or system technologies can be used to engage with patients? Include a minimum of 3 solutions.
  • Propose a process improvement strategy that will be used to evaluate patient engagement based on the 3 solutions mentioned above
  • How do the AACN Essentials (2021), QSEN modules, and ANA Standards apply?

Incorporate a minimum of 3 supporting academic peer-reviewed sources (journal articles)

Requirements

This assignment needs to be submitted following APA format (title page, headings, reference page, etc.). The 2-3 page paper number count does not include the title page and reference pages. Citations from References that are synthesized from the assigned article, course text, evidence-based and peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. A minimum of 3 resources are used. References must be current within 5 years

AACN competencies and sub-competencies must be clearly stated and appropriately applied

This assignment will be submitted below through Canvas and automatically run through TurnItIn. Please click here for more information on TurnItIn: TurnItIn Resources Course faculty monitor for the compliance of citations with Turnitin evaluation of the assignment during the course session.

NOTE: Evidence of plagiarism will result in a score of 0 for this assignment. Repeat offenses of plagiarism will result in more significant repercussions per the South College student handbook.

Evaluation: The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.

Rubric

NSG5110 Professional Paper Rubric


NSG5110 Professional Paper Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionLearning Outcome:

The question(s):

Why should the patient be part of the healthcare team?

How can you, as an ARNP, engage and active patient engagement? How can your colleagues? Why should this be important to them?

are answered and thoroughly discussed.

25 pts

Full Marks

All prompts or questions are answered and thoroughly discussed. Information is accurate, with supporting evidence (see additional resources requirement). Opinion is stated as such. AACN competencies and sub-competencies are clearly stated and appropriately applied

12 pts

Partial Points

Most prompts are answered and discussed. Discussion may not be thorough, and is missing vital information to support the point. All information may not be factual, or opinion may be presented as fact.

0 pts

No Marks

Many prompts or questions are left unanswered. No supporting evidence to distinguish factual information from opinion.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionLearning Outcome:

The question(s):

What informatics or system technologies can be used to engage with patients? Include a minimum of 3 solutions.

are answered and thoroughly discussed.

25 pts

Full Marks

All prompts or questions are answered and thoroughly discussed. Information is accurate, with supporting evidence (see additional resources requirement). Opinion is stated as such.

12 pts

Partial Points

12 pts Partial Points Most prompts are answered and discussed. Discussion may not be thorough, and is missing vital information to support the point. All information may not be factual, or opinion may be presented as fact.

0 pts

No Marks

Many prompts or questions are left unanswered. No supporting evidence to distinguish factual information from opinion.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionLearning Outcome:

The question(s):

Propose a process improvement strategy that will be used to evaluate patient engagement.

are answered and thoroughly discussed.

25 pts

Full Marks

All prompts or questions are answered and thoroughly discussed. Information is accurate, with supporting evidence (see additional resources requirement). Opinion is stated as such.

12 pts

Partial Points

12 pts Partial Points Most prompts are answered and discussed. Discussion may not be thorough, and is missing vital information to support the point. All information may not be factual, or opinion may be presented as fact.

0 pts

No Marks

Many prompts or questions are left unanswered. No supporting evidence to distinguish factual information from opinion.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionLearning Outcome:

The question(s):

How do the AACN Essentials, QSEN Competencies, and ANA Standards apply?

are answered and thoroughly discussed.

25 pts

Full Marks

All prompts or questions are answered and thoroughly discussed. Information is accurate, with supporting evidence (see additional resources requirement). Opinion is stated as such. AACN competencies and sub-competencies are clearly stated and appropriately applied

12 pts

Partial Points

Most prompts are answered and discussed. Discussion may not be thorough, and is missing vital information to support the point. All information may not be factual, or opinion may be presented as fact.

0 pts

No Marks

Many prompts or questions are left unanswered. No supporting evidence to distinguish factual information from opinion.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionSources

Minimum of 3 scholarly sources researched, discussed, and cited to support or disprove the concepts presented.

15 pts

Full Marks

Minimum of 3 scholarly sources researched, discussed, and cited to support or disprove the concepts presented

7 pts

Partial Points

1-2 scholarly sources researched, discussed, and cited to support or disprove the concepts presented.

0 pts

No Marks

No scholarly sources

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionAPA formatting (including cover and reference page), correct grammar, and spelling.

15 pts

Full Marks

No Errors in APA, grammar or spelling.

7 pts

Partial Points

Minimal errors (2-3) in APA formatting, grammar or spelling.

0 pts

No Marks

Many errors in APA formatting, grammar or spelling.

15 pts

Week 7 Discussion

No unread replies.No replies.

Discussions play an integral role in monitoring your course participation throughout the term. You should check back to the weekly discussions multiple times throughout the week to engage in the discussion with your professor and peers. Participation is only counted during the week in which this discussion is assigned. Be sure to appropriately cite any sources you use to support your responses with standard APA citations. Answer the prompt question(s) thoroughly using a minimum of 150-200 words and respond to as many of your peers as possible – note that responses to 2 of your peers are required for full credit. Be sure to answer any additional questions asked by your professor in the discussion threads. Your initial post is due by Day 3 of the current week, and follow-up posts to your peers are due on Day 7!

  • Initial Post due Day 3
  • Responses due Day 7
  • 50 Points

Discussion Question:Please read tis articleDownload this articlefor this discussion board.

After completing the QSEN modules and the AACN Essentials, discuss the importance of Evidence-based practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline.

  • How will you, as an advanced practice nurse incorporate EBP, scholarship, and professionalism into your practice?
  • How do these competencies work together?
  • How do social determinants of health and health quality support the future of nursing? In what ways does the APN demonstrate this?
  • Be sure to include specific sub-competencies in your post.

Give a brief summary of the article, then critically analyze the content. Refer to the learning activities overview in the student resources.

Purpose:

The purpose of the threaded discussion is to promote dialogue among students and faculty during the course.

Requirements:

  • The student must provide the initial substantive response to the discussion question/topic(s) posted by the course faculty by Friday of those weeks with a discussion board assignment.
  • The student must also provide a minimum of two additional responses to two student colleagues on two different days by Tuesday of those weeks with a discussion board assignment.
  • All questions posed to the initial student post by course faculty need to be answered by the student to earn full credit for the discussion board assignment.

This should be substantive feedback to a student colleague’s response to the question/topic posted by the course faculty. All responses must be respectful and thoughtful.

Discussion boards are not opinion boards. Students are expected to have scholarly sources to support their claims and constructs presented in the original post and citations must be provided. While scholarly resources are not required for your response posts, they do strengthen your posts and you must cite information taken from a source. Citations for parts of posts that are synthesized from the course text, peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. Course faculty monitor for the compliance of citations with Turnitin evaluation of the posts intermittently during the course session.

Note: This discussion requires you to complete your initial post before you can see your classmates’ posts. If you are having trouble getting started, please contact your instructo.