This week, you will begin to develop your Systematic Plan of Evaluation. Create

by

This week, you will begin to develop your Systematic Plan of Evaluation. Create a table that could be used to measure an academic nursing program’s curriculum and institutional support.

Your table should include:

  • Rows for each applicable standard from your chosen agency
  • Columns to address the evidence/data needed, methods to gather the needed evidence or data, benchmarks for success, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

In addition to your table, submit 2–3 paragraphs explaining your table and how it will be used.

This has to be in APA format, also it has to be as a correlation to the first assignment, see first attachment. The Second attachment is an example of how the table must be completed. References must be within less than 5 years.

Rubric:

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRows
20 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Identifies and includes all accrediting agency standards related to curriculum and institutional support.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Acceptable

Identifies and includes most accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Developing

Identifies and includes some accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

 8 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Identifies and includes few accrediting agency standards related curriculum and institutional support.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeColumns
20 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Identifies highly relevant and useful evidence needed and plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 16 to >12.0 pts

Acceptable

Identifies relevant and useful evidence needed and plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 12 to >8.0 pts

Developing

Identifies some evidence needed. May be missing plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 8 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify evidence needed. Missing plans for benchmarks and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion
30 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Fully explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Demonstrates a sophisticated ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 24 to >18.0 pts

Acceptable

Explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Demonstrates ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 18 to >12.0 pts

Developing

Partially explains how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. May fail to demonstrate ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

 12 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to explain how table will be used to evaluate a nursing program. Fails to demonstrate ability to critically think about the chosen accreditation agency’s standards, necessary evidence, benchmarks, and the “feedback loop” of reporting, communication, and continuous improvement.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Writing Mechanics
5 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.

 4 to >3.0 pts

Acceptable

The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

 3 to >2.0 pts

Developing

The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

 2 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
5 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

The assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

 4 to >3.0 pts

Acceptable

The assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

 3 to >2.0 pts

Developing

The assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

 2 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

5 pts

The post This week, you will begin to develop your Systematic Plan of Evaluation. Create appeared first on essaynook.com.

Related Posts