Overview of Learning and Teaching Activities on the Module
Teaching will be primarily through small group seminars, workshops, VLE/e-learning resources, and regularone-to-one tutorials with personal tutors/supervisors.
No |
Learning Outcomes |
1 |
Undertake a basic, subject specific literature review relevant to the focus of study. |
2 |
Employ a simple, discipline appropriate methodology for their investigation. |
3 |
Communicate their ideas, arguments and findings clearly using an individual proposal and individual essay. |
Description/Guidance
Topic: |
The module invites you write up a small individual project (TOPICS ARE GIVEN BELOW) |
Delivery method: |
Assignment |
Type/format: |
PROPOSAL |
Word count: |
1,200 words |
Weight: |
30% marks |
Submission method: |
CCCU Turnitin |
Basic guidelines: |
|
|
individual project. You MUST use college cover page template. |
Assessment grading criteria: |
25% Evaluation of process and the quality of information/data developed 25% Knowledge and application of subject and theories 10% Quality of sources used 10% Referencing 10% Clarity of objectives and focus of work 20% Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation and numeracy) |
Report Topics – Choose One.
- Investigate the factors that are contributing to the decline of the high street and analyse and discuss the suggestions that are being made as to how this should be handled.
- Analyse and discuss changes being made to packaging in response to environmental concerns and the implications of these changes for business, the consumer and for society.
- In light of technological advances, analyse and discuss how payment methods have changed for consumers and the implications of this.
- Consider that you are in the process of buying a new car. Would you choose a petrol, diesel, or electric version? Compare and contrast these three options, including consideration of cost, practicality, and reliability.
- With advances in streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon Prime, analyse and discuss the impact on cinema attendance. What can cinemas doing to increase their footfall?
The format for your Proposal/Report should contain the following:
- Cover/title page
- Table of content
- Introduction/Background to the research
- Research Aim and Objectives
- Literature Review
- Research Methodology
- Gant chart
- References
Referencing System:
The Business students are required to use Harvard as the standard referencing convention.
Learning Materials/Resources:
Recommended Reading list:
- Anderson, V. (2013), Research Methods in Human Resource Management. 3rd ed., CIPD.
- Blumberg, B., Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2011), Business Research Methods. 3rd ed., McGraw Hill.
- Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2014), Business Research. 4th ed., Palgrave Macmillan (available online from CCCU Library).
- Reardon, D. (2013), Doing Your Undergraduate Project. Sage.
- Redman, P. (2006), Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide. 3rd ed., Sage.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012), Research Methods for Business Students. 6th ed., FT Prentice Hall (available online from CCCU Library).
- Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2013), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building. 6th ed., Wiley.
Journals, magazines & academic articles related and relevant to the subject:
You are expected to keep abreast of current academic theory and the events and issues that involve or affect international logistics. This may be via published and academic journals, newspapers, trade magazines etc.
Websites:
You are expected to keep abreast of news, both specific to international logistics and general news as well as other information published in websites. Please note that the format and order of this reading list is for illustrative purposes only. Additional sources can also be found in Library services.
Students are requested to submit a single alphabetical order bibliography list containing all sources used for each piece of work submitted. For guidelines on the required Harvard referencing style please refer to: http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/library/docs/harvard.pdf
Transferable Skills
Cognitive skills of critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis:
- Effective problem solving and decision making using appropriate quantitative and qualitative skills
- Effective communication, oral and in writing, using a range of media
- Numeracy and quantitative skills including data analysis, interpretation, and extrapolation
- Effective use of Communication and Information Technology (CIT)
- Effective self-management in terms of time, planning and behaviour, motivation
- Learning to learn and developing an appetite for learning; reflective, adaptive, and collaborative learning
- Effective performance within a team environment
- Interpersonal skills of effective listening, negotiating, persuasion and presentation
- Abilities to conduct research into business and management issues, either individually or as part of a team for projects/dissertations/presentations.
Additional Information and Support
Remember that you MUST read this module handbook in conjunction with:
- The Programme Handbook(s) available on the student administration Blackboard(s) for your Programme(s). This not only provides general information about matters relating to your whole Programme of study but also provides help and guidance on support relating to personal problems that might be affecting your study as well as rules and procedures and links to academic support and careers and employment guidance and opportunities.
- If you are a Combined Honours student i.e., taking modules from different programmes/ departments, you must look at handbooks for both halves of your degree; similarly, students taking a module that is delivered by a Programme other than their own.
- Graduate skills information on https://www.canterbury.ac.uk/life-after-uni/career- planning/preparing-to-get-a-graduate-job.aspx
Most of what you need to know about your degree, rules, and procedures, where to find help and so on can also be found via your student portal as below: https://portal.canterbury.ac.uk.
We look forward to working with you – please don’t hesitate to communicate any concerns or needs to your supervisor and module leader who are always happy to help!
Appendix 1: Cover Page
Student Assessment Submission and Declaration
When submitting evidence for assessment, you must sign a declaration confirming that the work is your own.
Student name: |
|
ID No |
|
CCCU ID No |
|
||
Submission date: |
|
||
Programme: |
|
||
Module name and code: |
|
||
Title: |
|
||
Assessor name: |
|
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs and students who break the rules, however innocently, may be penalised. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct referencing practices. As a university level student, you are expected to use appropriate references throughout and keep carefully detailed notes of all your sources of materials for material you have used in your work, including any material downloaded from the Internet. Please consult the relevant unit lecturer or your course tutor if you need any further advice.
Student declaration I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work. I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice. |
|||
Student signature: |
|
Date: |
|
Grading Criteria
CRITERION |
100-80% Excellent |
79-70% Very good |
69-60% Good |
59-50% Sound |
49-40% Satisfactory |
39-20% Fail |
19-0% Fail |
A. KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING |
|||||||
1. Knowledge and |
Shows systematic |
Demonstrates an |
Shows an |
Sound but |
Selection of |
Knowledge of key |
There is a lack of |
application of |
and accurate |
accurate, |
accurate |
descriptive |
theory is |
theories is |
relevant subject- |
subject and |
knowledge and |
systematic |
understanding of |
knowledge of key |
satisfactory, and |
inaccurate and/or |
specific theory. |
theories |
understanding of |
understanding of |
key subject- |
theories with |
terminology, facts |
incomplete. |
|
|
key theories |
key theories. |
specific theories, |
appropriate |
and concepts are |
Choice of theory |
|
|
beyond what has |
Appropriately |
which are |
application; the |
handled |
inappropriate. |
|
|
been taught. |
selected |
appropriately |
work is balanced |
accurately, but |
Application |
|
|
Theories are |
theoretical |
integrated within |
towards the |
application and |
and/or |
|
|
consistently and |
knowledge is |
the context of the |
descriptive rather |
understanding are |
understanding is |
|
|
appropriately |
applied in the |
assessment task. |
than the critical or |
generalised or |
very limited. |
|
|
applied in the |
assignment. |
|
analytical. |
limited. |
|
|
|
assignment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Information |
Selects a broad |
Selects a range of |
Selects mostly |
Selects generally |
Selects some |
The selection of |
The selection of |
gathering/ |
range of highly |
relevant |
appropriate |
appropriate |
appropriate |
information is not |
information is not |
processing |
relevant |
information and |
information and |
information and |
information and |
appropriate to |
appropriate to the |
|
information and |
processes it |
processes it on |
processes it |
processes it |
the task and does |
task and the |
|
processes it |
effectively. |
the whole |
adequately. |
mainly adequately |
not seem to be |
information is not |
|
effectively. |
|
effectively. |
|
albeit with some |
systematic. |
processed. |
|
|
|
|
|
omissions or |
Information is not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
errors. |
processed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adequately and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there may be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inaccurate use of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
processing tools. |
|
3. Evaluation of |
Effectively |
Effectively |
Effectively |
Shows an |
Shows mostly |
Evaluation of |
The work shows |
process and the |
evaluates |
evaluates |
evaluates |
accurate basic |
accurate |
process and the |
limited or no |
quality of |
information/data |
information/data |
information |
evaluation of |
evaluation of |
information |
evaluation of |
information/data |
and the inquiry |
and the inquiry |
and/or data and |
information |
information and |
and/or data is |
either process or |
developed |
process, including |
process using |
the inquiry |
and/or data and |
or/data and some |
|
outcomes. |
|
some perceptive critique of the techniques used. |
prescribed guidelines. |
process using prescribed guidelines. |
some basic evaluation of the inquiry process used. |
consideration of the process used. |
incomplete or inaccurate. |
|
B. COGNITIVE SKILLS |
|||||||
4. Quality of |
Uses a |
Some use of |
Uses appropriate |
Mostly uses |
Uses a limited |
The work makes |
The work is based |
sources used |
combination of |
primary sources in |
secondary |
appropriate |
number of |
some use of |
on unreliable and/ |
|
primary sources |
conjunction with |
sources, with |
secondary |
appropriate |
appropriate |
or inappropriate |
|
and high-quality |
high quality |
some limited use |
sources, with |
secondary sources |
sources, but also |
sources. |
|
secondary |
secondary |
of primary |
some limited use |
with little or no |
draws upon |
|
|
sources. |
sources. |
sources. |
of primary |
direct use of |
unreliable and/or |
|
|
|
|
|
sources. |
primary sources. |
inappropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sources. |
|
5. Referencing |
Sources used are |
Sources used are |
Sources used are |
Most sources |
Consistent |
Citations of |
Little or no |
|
acknowledged in |
acknowledged in |
acknowledged in |
used are |
attempts to cite |
sources in the |
acknowledgement |
|
the text and |
the text and |
the text and |
acknowledged in |
sources in the text |
text are |
of sources of |
|
reference list and |
reference list and |
reference list. |
the text and |
but contains |
inconsistent, |
information in text |
|
are used |
used to support |
Referencing |
reference list. |
inaccuracies, |
inaccurate and/or |
and/or reference |
|
effectively to |
discussion. |
follows a |
Referencing |
inconsistencies |
incomplete. |
list. |
|
support |
Referencing |
systematic |
generally follows |
and/or omissions. |
Entries in the |
|
|
discussion. |
follows a |
approach, |
an approach, |
Integration |
bibliography/ |
|
|
Referencing |
systematic |
appropriate to the |
appropriate to the |
between text and |
reference list are |
|
|
follows a |
approach, |
discipline. Most |
discipline. Most |
reference list is |
incomplete |
|
|
systematic |
appropriate to the |
elements of |
elements of |
inconsistent. |
and/or absent. |
|
|
approach, |
discipline. All |
individual |
individual |
Some elements of |
|
|
|
appropriate to the |
elements of |
references are |
references are |
individual |
|
|
|
discipline. All |
individual |
present and |
present and |
references |
|
|
|
elements of |
references are |
accurate. |
accurate. |
contain errors. |
|
|
|
individual |
present. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
references are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
present. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Clarity of |
This work defines |
This work defines |
This work defines |
This work outlines |
This work uses |
In this piece of |
In this piece of |
objectives and |
appropriate |
appropriate |
some appropriate |
some appropriate |
generalised |
work objectives |
work no objectives |
focus of work |
objectives and |
objectives and |
objectives and |
but generalised |
objectives to |
are not |
are identified, and |
|
addresses them |
addresses them |
addresses them |
objectives and |
provide adequate |
appropriate |
the assignment |
|
logically and coherently throughout the work to an impressive extent. |
logically and coherently giving clear focus to the work. |
coherently, providing a clear focus to the work. |
addresses them in a way which gives some focus to the work. |
but limited focus to the work. |
and/or clearly identified – focus is not logical or coherent. |
lacks focus and coherence. |
7. Selecting |
Methodology |
Methodology |
Methodology |
Choice of |
Methodology |
The choice of |
The issue of |
research methods |
selected is |
chosen is |
selected is |
methodology is |
used is reasonably |
methodology and |
methodology is |
(Relationship |
effective and |
appropriate to the |
appropriate to the |
generally |
appropriate to the |
relationship to |
not addressed |
between method |
appropriate to the |
task and a very |
aims and |
appropriate to the |
task, albeit with |
information |
and/or an |
chosen and the |
aims and |
good rationale is |
objectives of the |
task and a limited |
some exceptions, |
and/or data being |
inappropriate |
nature of the |
objectives of the |
given to the |
task and a |
rationale is given |
and the brief |
collected is |
methodology is |
inquiry) |
task and an |
selection of this |
coherent |
for the selection |
rationale offered |
confused and |
selected. There is |
|
excellent rationale |
methodology |
rationale is |
of this |
for the selection |
confusing. |
little evidence of |
|
for its selection is |
from the range of |
provided for the |
methodology |
of this |
|
how planning was |
|
provided. |
prescribed ones. |
selection of this |
from the range of |
methodology |
|
used to complete |
|
|
|
methodology |
prescribed ones. |
refers to |
|
the task. |
|
|
|
from the range of |
|
established |
|
|
|
|
|
prescribed ones. |
|
guidance. |
|
|
8. Analysis |
Makes excellent |
Makes very |
Makes reasonable |
Makes |
Makes mainly |
Here the attempts |
The work does not |
|
use of pre-defined |
effective use of |
and accurate use |
satisfactory but |
satisfactory but |
at analysis are |
contain effective |
|
techniques of |
pre-defined |
of pre-defined |
limited use of pre- |
limited use of |
ineffective and/or |
analysis and does |
|
analysis relevant |
techniques of |
techniques of |
defined |
established |
uninformed by |
not yet engage |
|
to the discipline. |
analysis relevant |
analysis, relevant |
techniques of |
techniques of |
the discipline. |
with key |
|
Shows developing |
to the discipline. |
to the discipline. |
analysis, relevant |
analysis, relevant |
|
disciplinary |
|
ability to compare |
Shows some |
Shows developing |
to the discipline. |
to the discipline. |
|
techniques. |
|
alternative |
awareness of |
awareness of |
|
Some errors or |
|
|
|
theories/analytic |
alternative |
alternative |
|
omissions may be |
|
|
|
approaches |
theories/analytic |
theories/analytic |
|
present. |
|
|
|
(where relevant). |
approaches |
approaches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(where relevant). |
(where relevant). |
|
|
|
|
9. Conclusions |
Conclusions show |
Conclusions show |
Logical |
Generally sound |
Some relevant |
The work |
The work either |
|
critical insight and |
critical insight and |
conclusions are |
conclusions are |
conclusions are |
demonstrates |
lacks a conclusion |
|
excellent |
very good |
drawn which |
drawn, supported |
drawn which are |
limited or |
or presents an |
|
development of |
development of |
show some critical |
by relevant |
derived from |
inaccurate |
unsubstantiated |
|
thinking. They |
thinking. They |
insight and are |
evidence/theory/ |
limited |
understanding of |
and/or invalid |
|
draw the |
draw the |
clearly derived |
literature. Some |
understanding of |