Learning Resources: Organizational Gap Evidence Search

5 PAGES

To prepare:

Review the Learning Resources for this week which focus on how to successfully search and appraise search results.
Review the course textbook Appendices E, F, and G, located in the Learning Resources for this week, which you will be required to complete and submit as part of this Assignment.
Select one organizational type and one gap in practice or practice change on which to focus for this Assignment.
Note: You may select a new organizational type and gap in practice or practice change or, if you choose, you may reuse one on which you focused for a previous Assignment, Discussion, or Blog in this course.

Also Note: These may or may not be the same organizational type and gap in practice or practice change as those you will focus on for your Practicum and DNP Project.

Consider all of the factors you should take into account when searching the evidence, then, using the Walden Library databases, conduct a search related to the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected.
Consider all of the factors you should take into account when apprising evidence, then, using the course text Appendices E, F, and G, appraise the results of your search.
Based on your appraisals, identify the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you think are most relevant to your research goals.
Note: For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of five documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).

Be sure to review the grading rubric for this Assignment so you fully understand what is expected of you. To access the rubric, scroll down to the bottom of the Assignment page.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Write a paper in which you do the following:

Describe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search you conducted.
Describe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
- Which database(s) did you select? Why did you choose them?
- Which key words did you select? Why did you choose them?
Describe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following:
- How many articles did you find?
- Based on what criteria did you decide on the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected?
Include copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected.
- Note: For this Assignment, you must complete Appendix G based on having completed either Appendix E or F for each of the three articles you selected, as appropriate. You will submit a total of five documents (four completed Appendices along with your 2–3-page paper).

Note: Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations. The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site. for your Assignment submission.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your five documents as W8Assgn_Lastname_Firstinitial_doc1 and W8Assgn_Lastname_Firstinitial_doc2, etc.
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File.
Click “Add another file” to repeat step 3 for the second document required to complete this Assignment.
Select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_8002_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Describe the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change you selected and explain the goals of the search they conducted

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately and clearly explains the goals of the search they conducted.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response adequately describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and accurately explains the goals of the search they conducted.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately or vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organizational type and gap in practice or practice change they selected and inaccurately and vaguely explains the goals of the search they conducted, or it is missing.

5 pts

Describe your process of searching the evidence. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • Which database(s) did they select? Why did they choose them? • Which key words did they select? Why did you choose them?

10 to >8.9 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.

8.9 to >7.9 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response adequately describes their process of searching the evidence as explained in the criteria.

7.9 to >6.9 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles.

6.9 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.

10 pts

Describe your process of appraising the evidence you identified. Be specific and provide examples. Include the following: • How many articles did you find? • Based on what criteria did you decide on the three recent (within the last five years), peer-reviewed articles that you selected?

20 to >17.8 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and clearly describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.

17.8 to >15.8 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response adequately describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.

15.8 to >13.8 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria.

13.8 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes their process of appraising the evidence they identified as explained in the criteria or it is missing.

20 pts

Include copies of your completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that you completed as appropriate for each of the articles you selected.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response includes accurate and clear copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response includes adequate copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response includes inaccurate or vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response includes inaccurate and vague copies of their completed Appendix G, along with the Appendices E and/or F that they completed as appropriate for each of the articles they selected. or it is missing.

30 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 80

I can help you work on this Assignment. No AI. No Plagiarism. Quality Work Guaranteed. Contact Me!

You can also explore more resources on our website.

Thessays Academic Writer & Editor

To prepare:

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

By Day 7 of Week 8

submission information

Rubric

You May Also Find Helpful

Equation Editor: CHEM1412 Formal Laboratory Report: Expert Assignment Guide

Non Performance: Operating & Capital Budget Development for Nurse Leaders

Performance Does: Strategic Planning Presentation Guide for Healthcare Leaders