Author: admin

INSTRUCTIONS

1. James, a 5-year-old boy with autism, often hits his peers to gain access to preferred toys. The FBA indicated that peer attention and access to toys maintain his hitting behavior.1. Identify the reinforcement maintaining the behavior in the scenario2. Describe how you would implement an extinction procedure for the target behavior.3. Predict and explain the short-term effects of implementing the extinction procedure.4. Discuss the potential long-term effects of the extinction procedure.5. Identify any ethical considerations associated with the extinction procedure in the scenario.Assignment Requirements:
   1. Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
   2. The submission must be APA 7 formatted.
   3. The assignment should be a minimum of 3-4 pages (not including the title page and reference page)
   4. Please include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations as needed.

   Identification of Reinforcement (3 Points)

   • 3 Points: Clearly and accurately identifies both forms of reinforcement maintaining James’ hitting behavior (peer attention and access to toys).

   Implementation of Extinction Procedure (5 Points)

   • 5 Points: Provides a detailed and comprehensive plan for implementing extinction that addresses both sources of reinforcement (peer attention and access to toys). Includes clear steps and strategies.

   Prediction and Explanation of Short-term Effects (3 Points)

   • 3 Points: Predicts short-term effects accurately and provides a clear and detailed explanation supported by principles of extinction (e.g., extinction burst, emotional responses).

   Discussion of Potential Long-term Effects (4 Points)

   • 4 Points: Discusses potential long-term effects comprehensively, including how the behavior might decrease over time and considerations of spontaneous recovery.

   Ethical Considerations (5 Points)

   • 5 Points: Identifies and discusses ethical considerations associated with implementing extinction in the scenario, such as potential harm to peers or considerations of informed consent.

General Overview: Select one of the two articles that have been provided to you to critique. This assessment will help you recognize the value of research in psychology and the value of supporting your claims with established views and research.

Next, based on your understanding of the article, answer the following questions that pertain to essential literature review elements:

• What is the title of the article? Provide the citation for the article in APA format.
• Explain how you determined the credibility of the research provided?
• What is the purpose of the article?
• What is the hypothesis of the study? In other words, what claims do the authors make in the article?
• What variables (factors) are being looked? How are these factors assessed or measured in the article?
• What type of research design is used in the study? What instruments or measures did the researchers use to collect data?
• Do you think the research in this article was conducted in an ethical manner? Why or why not?

Guidelines for Submission:

-You will upload the paper as a Word document to Blackboard for grading and feedback.

-The paper must follow APA format (i.e. cover page, Times New Roman font size 12, and double spaced).

-Each question must be answered in at least 1-3 sentences, although you can write more if needed.

-Be sure to cite directly from the sample article in order to support your answers.

-Review the full rubric (attached) for details of the critical elements.

Article Critique Rubric.pdf
Mental hx beliefs and their relationship w tx seeking among veterans.pdf
Self_Injury and Suicidality with LGBTQ youth.pdf

At three times during the semester, you are expected to write a brief reflection paper which requires you to take the perspectives of various individuals. You have the option to submit up to 3 reflection papers. The top 2 marks will be chosen for your grade. The reflection papers are due any time before their respective deadlines. That is, you do not have to write a reflection paper the same week as an exam. You can choose to do it beforehand.

You have to write one reflection paper

reflection paper 1 and in a word document.

Reflection 1 Topic Name is – Eating (Eating Disorder)

Format

You are asked to write a brief reflection (approximately 500 words), written in prose (i.e., complete, grammatically correct, and polished sentences). In this reflection paper you need to address the following questions:

1. What do you think would be most difficult for individuals who experience this disorder?

Something that would have strengthened your paper is including more on the diagnostic criteria for Eating , as well as share some examples on how it can differ between different people.

2. What do you think would be most difficult for the families and/or friends of an individual with this disorder?

Similarly, I would have loved to see you offer some thoughts on what the individual and their family/friends could do to address these issue. Should they become more educated on the topic? Is there treatment options for individuals with eating disorder?

3. What do you think is the most damaging stereotype, misconception, or misunderstanding of these types of disorders commonly held by the public?

Note: You are asked not to divulge any personal mental health information in these reflections. Rather, your aims should be to: 1) consider the spectrum of human experience and 2) reflect on the experiences of individuals who have faced severe challenges, along with their families and friends.

Grading Expectations

Each paper is marked out of 15 marks.

• Paper addresses at least 3 of the specified questions (/3 marks)
• Paper adheres to the length guidelines (i.e., between 350 and 650 words) (/1 mark)
• Paper is well-written (e.g., free from grammatical errors, typos), well organized, coherent (/1 mark)
• Engagement: For each question, the content clearly demonstrates the student’s engagement with the material and depth of consideration (e.g., an ability to adopt another frame of reference from one’s own in describing various perspectives of individuals involved) (/9 marks). *See more detail below.

*FURTHER DETAILS ON THE 8 MARKS FOR ENGAGEMENT AND DEPTH OF CONSIDERATION:

9 – Outstanding

• Exceptional understanding of the disorder that they are discussing (e.g., solid grasp of diagnostic criteria, as well as how it may present differently in different individuals, and how this may differ from similar disorders)
• Goes outside of the textbook to gain further insight and information about the disorder
• Demonstrates exceptional depth and insight in reflecting on the topic. Goes beyond diagnostic criteria and speaks to the complex difficulties that may be present, at an individual and systems level (e.g., inter-generational effects, barriers to accessing treatment)
• Really gets “in the mind” of the individual or family member (or both), and conveys an exceptional level of compassion, empathy, and awareness in doing so. Able to separate their own ideas from those of the individual for the purposes of the reflection.
• Uses person-centred and dignified language when speaking about individuals impacted by the disorder
• Considers the complexities of each individual when reflecting on this material (e.g., not all people with social anxiety are introverts)
• In speaking about “what society can do”, student moves beyond themes of education and raising awareness

Suggestion given by mam. Both of these below suggestion have to be followed

This should be focused more and more as mam has suggested to strength

Something that would have strengthened your paper is including more on the diagnostic criteria for eating disorder, as well as share some examples on how it can differ between different people.

Similarly, I would have loved to see you offer some thoughts on what the individual and their family/friends could do to address these issue. Should they become more educated on the topic? Is there treatment options for individuals with eating disorder?

• Question: Why do you want to go on an immersion trip?
• Description of the trip
  • Short immersion trip to either the Dominican Republic or Rome, GA for nursing students to help the local population of the area
• Goal
  • Write
    an appealing short essay (no more than 5000 characters) to make a case
    as to why I would like to go on a nursing immersion trip to the
    Dominican Republic or Rome, GA
• Need to include:
  • Personal aspect à find a personal reason to tie to your motivation for going on the trip
  • How the trip will benefit you as a nursing student
    • Can include points about applying the knowledge you’ve learned in lecture
    • Applying the skills you’ve learned in clinical practice
  • How you will be a resource/helpful on the trip to the school, your peers, and the organization
  • Maybe even a point about how this is a great opportunity to learn from another culture and their health practice
  • i am from Nigeria and i would like incorporate that to the essay. Knowing my interest is towards Public Health nursing and Nurse Forensic.
  • let the essay Sound convincing and very passionate

The post Question: Why do you want to go on an immersion trip?
Description of the tripSho appeared first on essaynook.com.

Part 1: You learned in the reading this week that protein supplements are not necessary for muscle building and that excess protein consumption and amino acid supplementation can be dangerous. Give an example of a detrimental result of one of the following: consuming excess protein, using protein supplements or using amino acid supplements… and analyze why it takes place. Be sure to cite your source(s).

Part 2: Application, Analysis, Synthesis and Evaluation. Select a food you regularly eat or like to eat that contains lipids. Analyze and evaluate the types and amounts of lipid(s) it contains and discuss the connections that the types and amount of lipid(s) consumed might have on health. Be sure to cite your source(s).