Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Your Homework Assignment

Author: admin

  • Peer Responses: Length: A minimum of 180 words per post, not including reference

    Peer Responses:

    • Length: A minimum of 180 words per post, not including references
    • Citations: At least two high-level scholarly reference in APA per post from within the last 5 years

    My healthcare capstone project is primarily centered on dealing with the management of chronic disease in an elderly patient in an attempt to improve the quality of their lives, hence the increase in quality healthcare interventions. Evaluation of need at an individual and community level is vital to this to a certain extent because it provides scope on various challenges and assets that may be available and necessary for the proper attendance of a chronic ailment (Parry et al., 2021). Awareness of these requirements means that the treatments enhance the ability to solve the identified health challenges of the elderly patients and assist in creating an environment where the elderly patients and their families can be supported to gain better health.

    Identified Individual Needs

    The old chronic disease patients as a group have several special requirements to be met to enhance the care of the patient. One of the most important issues is the simultaneous treatment of several chronic diseases, as it is essential to monitor and treat one illness without harming the other. Maintenance of polypharmacy issues is also important always since elderly patients have many diseases and usually take many drugs with high chances of drug interactions and side effects (Robinson, 2021). Another aspect with which infants born preterm deal is the cognitive aspect, the pediatric interventions required to encompass memory, decision-making, and daily functioning. Second, reducing social isolation seems critical since it leads to depression and overall health decline, which means that social support and community participation should be included in patients’ management strategies.

    Identified Community Needs

    At the community level, it is ironic that there are several crucial needs for the management of chronic diseases among elderly patients. Every elderly patient should receive comprehensive geriatric care because he or she may have one or multiple health issues typical for this age group (Garrard et al., 2019). The other requirements are medical equipment and educational tools, which are important in the conformability of diseases at the home. The practice and operational continuation of programs such as these, which address the needs of senior citizens, require funding and support from healthcare institutions and funding bodies. Further, the availability of other agencies in the community that provide constant information dissemination and patient support serves as a critical aspect in the patient’s self-management of their condition as well as further improvement of their quality of life.

    Relevance of Research Inquiry

    The selected research inquiry is significant to the practice regarding individual and community necessities in the case of chronic illness treatment of elderly patients. One that may be an organizational struggle is the private nature of every client and devising an individual care plan, which can be regarded as following patient-centered care. Engaging the use of the Trans-theoretical Model, the project is well-equipped to implement relevant change strategies that are completely appropriate and applicable according to the patient’s stages of change (Mwiti, 2020). This model also incorporates the aspects of patient education and patient self-management, which are essential for compliance with the recommended therapeutic regimens and consequent enhancement of health statuses. Thus, the research theme intervenes and directly responds to the expressed essential requirements of elderly patients with chronic diseases in terms of adopting practical methods that would help them access optimal care and manage their diseases accordingly, lengthening their lives and empowering the quality of the lives of chronic disease patients.

    Anticipated Impact of Research Findings

    The intended implication of the research findings is that society is expected to benefit in terms of its individuals and communities. In this case, the integration of individual care plans and selective interventions based on the Trans-theoretical model is anticipated to contribute to better elders’ health and improved or maintained functional status. This approach will assist in decreasing the cases of people who continuously visit hospitals, seek readmission, or end up in the emergency units due to complications as a result of failure to treat the primary conditions. Patients will be better informed and more actively involved with their care since the default approach of healthcare institutions will be patient-centered communication (Mwiti, 2020). At a communal level, the study’s findings will help design efficient healthcare delivery systems since proper usage of resources such as medical equipment for teaching and support service materials will be enhanced. In conclusion, the research will advise health care practice and policy development to be more preventative rather than reactive to health problems, thus promoting virtuous health results for the individual and the larger society.

    In conclusion, the evaluation of individuals as well as communities is vital within evidence-based practice to guarantee that the healthcare measures implemented are beneficial and appropriate. Specifically, the capstone project based on the preparation of individual care plans for elderly patients with chronic diseases will satisfy these needs, using the principles of the Transtheoretical Model. This proposal aims to put strategies that would adequately address elderly patients’ needs and, by doing so, boost treatment effectiveness, involve the patient in their treatment process, and look for cost-effective solutions with the support from the community, hence more efficient health systems.

    References

    Garrard, J. W., Cox, N. J., Dodds, R. M., Roberts, H. C., & Sayer, A. A. (2019). Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: A systematic review. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 32(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w

    Mwiti, B. K. (2020). Bottom-up design approach: A community-led intervention in fighting lifestyle diseases within urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Erepository.uonbi.ac.ke. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/152984

    Parry, J., Vanstone, M., Grignon, M., & Dunn, J. R. (2021). Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: A scoping review of the literature. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01546-8

    Robinson, P. (2021). Pharmacology, polypharmacy and the older adult: A review. British Journal of Community Nursing, 26(6), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.6.290

  •  Please note this is NOT research. To conduct research, you would need IRB cert

     Please note this is NOT research. To conduct research, you would need IRB certification. This is an educational task to learn about research. For this lab project, we will be conducting an experiment on the relationship between imagery and recall. Research has shown that imagery tends to facilitate memory processes. In this experiment, we will test this idea.

    • Design
      This lab project will illustrate a two-factor, completely between-subjects experimental design. There are two factors: Instruction Type (Imagery versus Rehearsal) and Word Type (Concrete and Abstract). Hence this experiment is a 2 x 2 factorial.
    • Participants 
      Each of you will be responsible for finding and running four participants (one in each of the experimental conditions).
    • Materials
      The materials for this experiment will be an informed consent form, the instructions to be read to or by participants (adapt the forms you used in Week 2’s lab), and two lists of words, one consisting of concrete nouns and the other consisting of abstract nouns (see attached lists). Additionally, each participant will be provided with a response sheet.
    • Procedure
      Participants are to be approached and asked if they would mind taking part in a simple experiment on memory. If the participant agrees, find a quiet place to conduct the experiment. Give the participant an informed consent form, and read the form to him or her. After reading the informed consent form, have the participant sign and date it and return it to you. Next, read to the participant the appropriate instructions, and read the list of word pairs. The list should be read at a rate of one word pair every 15 seconds in all conditions.
      After reading the list to the participant, go back and read each stimulus word to the participant, and have him or her write down the appropriate response word on the response sheet. Read the list of stimulus words at a rate of one every 15 seconds.

    Note: Each “experimenter” must run one participant in each of the experimental conditions. (So each of you will run a participant in the imagery/concrete words, imagery/abstract words, rehearsal/concrete words, and rehearsal/abstract words conditions.)Follow and complete the attached  Lab Instructions Lab Instructions – Alternative Formats . When you are done, write up your experience and report the following in the following format.  The words in Bold are the titles to include and the words in italics are the instructions. Do not use the first person or any personage- simply report what design was used.  There is no need to include an introduction or abstract as we are only working on these areas at the moment. This is, of course, not the typical way of conducting research, but as noted earlier, this is practice, not research.                                  METHODOLOGY (centered section header- nothing is written in addition to this section title)Design (subheader ) 
    In this section, describe the basic design of this experiment. You should not include the details on procedures, but rather explain the type of design used to run the study.  Please see the information on this above and paraphrase this in your own words based on what actually happened when you ran the experiment.  Participants (subheader) 
    In this section, describe the participants included in the study. This typically includes recruitment information, gender, age, and any other information that may help understand who participated in the study (location, for example). Procedures (subheader)
    In this section, describe exactly what happened to the participants. This should include enough detail to be able to be replicated.                                   RESULTS (centered section header)In this section, report the results of the experiment. This should not include the *raw* data, but a report on the results. For this experiment, it may compare the percent or number correct by each condition.                                   DISCUSSION (centered section header) In this section, explain or interpret the outcome of the results. As you are not including a literature review, this can be conjecture.  Still, avoid using personage and just state the explanation. When you do not cite in an article, we know it was you who is speaking or your interpretation. Qualitative Reflection:  Although not part of an experimental research report, in this section write an account of what it was like to be an experimenter. Were there any surprises or unexpected challenges? What did you think of the experience? In this section, you SHOULD use the first person as it is appropriate. .
     Upload the report formatted without the instructions along with a blank consent form that you used no later than the end of Week 2, Sunday.  

  • Write 400-600 words in APA 7 format with proper in-text citations. Include 2-3

    Write 400-600 words in APA 7 format with proper in-text citations. Include 2-3 scholarly references and provide copies of all used references.  

    Assignment Details:

    Review and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 400-600 words on the following: 

    • What were the most compelling topics learned in this course? 
    • How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? 
    • Is anything still unclear that could be clarified? 
    • What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information? 
    • COURSE DESCRIPTION:The rising cost of healthcare in the United States continues to be on the forefront of many political campaigns and discussions. This course will provide an overview of global health problems and national health systems to provide the student with a perspective on how societies in developed and under-developed countries approach health and healthcare including cultural, economic and political factors. In addition to national systems, the roles played by certain global/international systems such as the Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx), World Health Organization (WHO), certain United Nations (UN) agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), will be explored. The student will examine the struggles faced by healthcare leaders in managing multiple demands and pressures to contain costs while providing quality care.

    COURSE OBJECTIVES:

    • Analyze the development of the Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx) and the significance towards world health improvement, data mining, global health reform and debate the need to adopt new technologies versus allocating resources for direct primary care (technology).
    • Analyze the interrelationship of global health to foreign policy and macroeconomics while examining US Healthcare spending on an international perspective.
    • Analyze the underlying determinants of biological and cultural perspectives on public health.
    • Examine the influence of social and cultural constructs to sickness and healing while differentiating between preventive and curative services and the need for balancing these services from a financial perspective.
    • Propose the need for maintaining a well-trained healthcare workforce and ensuring consumer participation when providing healthcare services
    • Research the significant differences between several major health systems in the world.

  • Research studies in forensic psychology that utilize quantitative research designs are more common than those using the qualitative approach. As previously pointed out, qualitative designs have only recently been accepted in forensic psychology research. However, many forensic psychologists and forensic psychology professionals are realizing that much can be learned in many areas of study by using qualitati

    Research studies in forensic psychology that utilize quantitative research designs are more common than those using the qualitative approach. As previously pointed out, qualitative designs have only recently been accepted in forensic psychology research. However, many forensic psychologists and forensic psychology professionals are realizing that much can be learned in many areas of study by using qualitative research designs instead of quantitative. Furthermore, the differences between quantitative and qualitative designs are not as distinct as you might imagine.To prepare for this assignment:Review the article, “From Single Case to Database: A New Method for Enhancing Psychotherapy Practice.” Pay particular attention to how both quantitative and qualitative research designs are used to evaluate individual case studies.Choose and review a research study in the area of forensic psychology that uses a quantitative design and another that uses a qualitative design. If possible, try to find articles that focus on similar or related topics or research questions in forensic psychology.Consider the similarities and differences between the two studies in terms of the designs of the studies, the data collection and analysis methods, and the nature of the interpretation of results and conclusions drawn.The assignment (2–3 pages):In APA formatting:Briefly describe the quantitative study you selected.Briefly describe the qualitative study you selected.Compare (similarities and differences) the two studies in terms of the designs, the methods of data collection and analysis, the nature of the interpretation, and conclusions drawn.Explain an insight you had or conclusion you now might draw as a result of/based on your comparison.