Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Assessment Brief: BIS2006 Management Information Systems Trimester 2, 2024 Assessment Overview

Assessment Brief: BIS2006 Management Information Systems Trimester 2, 2024 Assessment Overview

Assessment Task

 

Type

Weighting

Length

Due

ULOs Assessed

Assessment 1: Quiz

Online quiz of key content areas 

Individual

 

Invigilated

40%

30 mins (equiv.

1000 words)

 

Week 

3,
5, 7, 9

ULO-1

ULO-2

ULO-3

ULO-4

ULO-5

Assessment 2: Case
Study-1
Students should identify an unresolved problem situation (only
one) in an organisation and propose a solution by doing critical analysis
about it. 

Individual

 

 

30%

2500 words

Week 

6

ULO-1

ULO-2

ULO-3

Assessment 3: Case
Study-2
Analyse a given case study as a group regarding the use
information systems in an organisation and recommend solutions to their
Business and IS/IT problems.

 

Group

 

30%

 

 

 

3000 words

 

 

 

Week 

12

 

 

 

ULO-3

ULO-4

ULO-5

 

Assessment 1: Online Quiz

Due date:

Week 3, 5, 7, 9

Group/individual:

Individual

Word count / Time
provided:

30 minutes

Weighting:

40%

Unit Learning
Outcomes:

ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5

 

Assessment Details:

These online quizzes will assess your knowledge of key content areas of learning materials from weeks 1 to 9. For successful completion of the quizzes, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and participate in the discussion forums. 

These quizzes will be completed online through the APIC Online Learning System (OLS). 

Marking Information: There will be four quizzes conducted during trimester, each quiz will be marked out of 100 and weighted 10%, together, they will comprise a total of 40% of the total unit mark.

 

Assessment 2: Case Study-1

Due date:

Week 6

Group/individual:

Individual

Word count / Time
provided:

2500 words

Weighting:

30%

Unit Learning
Outcomes:

ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3

 

Assessment Details:

This assignment assesses the student’s application of theoretical learning to practical, real-world and/or simulated situations.

Mini Case Study

ShoeSmart

 

ShoeSmart is an online retail business founded by Achiles Bunion in 2010. The company decided to investigate a Business Intelligence (BI) solution to analyse around a million transactions from almost 100,000 customers in their database. To better understand what their customers want, they also like to implement a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solution. Together with their BI system, they also hope it will give them insight on the needs of their customers so they can come up with new products/services.

The vision of the company is “to be the go-to online retail store for Australians for their shoe needs” by offering speed, convenience, choice, and price delivered to customer doors within 30 minutes or less. To speed up their warehouse and delivery operations, they currently use an RFID asset tracking system in their packing warehouses to speed up locating and allocating resources. They also use a proprietary GPS system that allow their delivery drivers to find the fastest routes to their destinations and avoid any delays. 

One of their main competitors, FootFriend recently used analytics to build a data-centric approach to its business. For example, the initial reports produced by their BI system identified that Nike Air, Converse Chuck Taylor All-Star and Adidas Superstar were their most popular shoes in the last quarter of 202x. As a result, they’ve realised that Big Data could reveal insights they don’t know before which could even create new sources of revenue for the business.

“We had a lot of data coming from our point-of-sales software. Initially, the challenge was how to a develop a quick way to talk to the company’s POS database. After they found an easy way to access the data, their next challenge was to drill down into the information in ways that would positively impact business results. Our goal was to use the huge amount of transaction data in a cost-effective way and find the right metrics to help us drive our business forward,” said Tibilias Talus, vice president of R&D and analytics at FootFriend.

FootFriend use Tableau to crunch its data. Tableau is a data visualization software focused on business intelligence. Tableau is a powerful and fastest growing data visualization tool. It helps in simplifying raw data into the very easily understandable format in the form of dashboards and worksheets. Tableau is cost-effective as it only cost them $70 per month for the subscription. After rolling out their Big Data strategy, FootFriend have nearly doubled their annual sales to $878,850 and welcomed an additional 15,000 customers in 202x, a 10% increase in total customer count.

In contrast, ShoeSmart used Microsoft Access but eventually used SQL to talk directly to the company’s POS database. Luckily, they have an in-house IT personnel specialising in SQL who made all the necessary queries and reports that they need for organisational decision-making. However, they are now in need of an analytics software that could make reports in an understandable format in the form of dashboards and worksheets to help simplify decision-making. Hence, they are currently investigating the possibility of also using Tableau and have hired an external consultant to help them in this regard.

ShoeSmart said that the three foremost analytics questions they asked:

•        How can we further improve our services?

•        How do we reduce delivery times?

•        How can we find hidden needs and fill up with new products and services?

 

The problems they are facing include information silos, decentralised data, lack of data analytics and visualisation strategies, lack of business intelligence skilled personnel and lack of customer relationship management system solution.

Initial investigation revealed that possible CRM solutions includes cloud-based CRM such as Zoho CRM, Salesforce, SugarCRM or Monday.com. However, they are still at a lost whether to go proprietary or open-source, and assuming they will use Tableau as their BI system, will it interface well with their CRM solution of choice? They would like you to help them in this regard.

Once you formulated your recommendation solution, you now need to provide a critique of the proposed solution. Your critique should include a discussion of the features of the proposed enterprise CRM solution, its functions in support of business processes, such as its ability to produce customer insight reports, including a justification of its “fitness” to the organisational needs, such as alignment to the company’s strategic goals (such as, will this CRM solution help better understand customer needs?). It may also include cost/benefit calculations, such as ROI, payback analysis, and Net Present Value (NPV). Also, will the proposed CRM solution interface well with Tableau?

You are required to describe the role of information systems in supporting operations and organisational decision making (ULO-1), discuss the features of enterprise systems and their functions to support business processes (ULO-2), and critique the alignment of an organisation’s information systems strategy and business strategy (ULO-3). 

The following areas should be covered in your assignment using the case study context:

1.      Provide a brief description of the organisation 

2.      Provide a description of the current information systems problems (e.g., information silos, lack of BI capabilities, etc) and describe the role of information systems in supporting operations and organisational decision making (e.g., creation of dashboards and worksheets)

3.      Discuss the features of enterprise systems and their functions to support business processes and how its implementation will provide real benefits to organisation (e.g., competitive advantage, improved customer traffic, improved sales and profit, etc)

4.      Critique the information system solutions proposed. Are they aligned to the company’s business strategic vision?

5.      A report of 2500 words summarising your analysis must be submitted by the due date. Reasonable assumptions are allowed.

Penalty for Late submission: a deduction of 5% of the total mark shall be imposed on each of the next subsequent days. 

Submission requirements

1.      Use a typical report structure, with a Cover Page, Table of Contents, Introduction, Body, Recommendation/Conclusion and References format. Executive Summary is not required in this report.

2.      The References are excluded in the word count.

3.      The Cover Page should clearly indicate the name of the person submitting the report and the word count.

4.      You can use each question above as Headings in the Body of your report.

5.      All References should reflect quality citations from relevant academic journals and adhere to the correct Harvard format (Wikipedia NOT allowed).

Marking Information: The Case Study-1 will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark.

 

Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking

Criteria

Not satisfactory

(0-49%) of the criterion mark)

Satisfactory

(50-64%) of the criterion mark

Good

(65-74%) of the criterion mark

Very Good

(75-84%) of the criterion mark

Excellent

(85-100%) of the criterion mark

Introduction and

organisation  Brief
description of the

organisation 

 

(10%)

 

Fails to
provide an overview of the organisation

Provides a general overview
of the organisation background

 

Provides a good overview of
the organisation background 

 

Provides a very good
overview of the organisation background

 

 

Provides an
outstanding overview with very clear organisation background

 

Problem

Analysis Description of the current
information systems

problems
and the role of information systems in supporting operations

Fails to
provide adequate description and analysis of the current problems and the
role of information systems in supporting operations and
organisational
decision making

Provides a general description with very limited analysis of the
current problems and/or lacks enough details about the role of information
systems in supporting operations and

Provides a
general description with limited critical analysis of the current problems
and the role of information systems in supporting operations and
organisational
decision making

Provides a
description and some critical analysis of the current problems and the role
of information systems in supporting operations and
organisational
decision making

 

Provides an outstanding
description and careful and critical analysis of the current problems and the
role of information systems in supporting operations and
organisational
decision making

 

and
organisational

decision making

 

(25%)

 

 

organisational
decision making

 

 

 

Discussion of proposed systems/ solutions Discuss the features of
enterprise systems and their functions to support business processes and how
its implementati on will provide real benefits to organisation 

 

 (25%)

 

Fails to provide adequate discussion of the
features of enterprise systems and their functions to support business
processes and how its implementation will provide real benefits to
organisation 

 

Provides a
general description of the features of enterprise systems and their functions
to support business processes and how its implementation will provide real
benefits to organisation

Provides a
general description of the features of enterprise systems and their functions
to support business processes and how its implementation will provide real
benefits to organisation

Provides a description of the features of
enterprise systems and their functions to support business processes and how
its implementation will provide real benefits

to
organisation

 

 

Provides an outstanding
description of the features of enterprise systems and their functions to
support business processes and how its implementation will provide real
benefits to organisation

 

Critical review

 

Review the role of business intelligence and
business analytics in supporting business decision making.

 

(20%)

 

Fails to provide adequate review the role of
business intelligence and business analytics in supporting business decision
making

 

Provides a general review
the role of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting
business decision making

 

Provides a
review the role of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting
business decision making

Provides a detailed review
the role of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting
business decision making

 

 

 

Provides an outstanding
review the role of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting
business decision making

 

Structure and organization How
logically arguments are stated and how critically problems are analysed

 

(10%)

Does not
clearly state a conclusion or point of view or else little or no supporting
reasoning or evidence is presented. Problem situation is not critically
analysed.

States a
conclusion or point of view but does not organize the evidence or reasons in
a logically adequate way. Analysis of the problem situation is not that
satisfactory. 

States a
conclusion or point of view but expected to be organized more logically.
Analysis of the problem situation is so far reasonable. 

Presents
an argument using evidence and /or logical reasoning in support of a point of
view. Problem situation is analysed with satisfactory level of critical
analysis skills.

Develops a
clearly articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical
reasoning in support of a conclusion or point of view. The way problem
situation is analysed requires high level of critical analysis skills.

Writing

Quality &

Adherence to

Format

Guidelines

 

(10%)

Report shows a below
average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard
English and following proper Harvard guidelines. Frequent errors in spelling,
grammar,

punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or
formatting.

 

Report
shows below average and/or casual writing style using standard English and
following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or formatting.

Report
shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English and
following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or formatting.

Report shows above average
writing style and clarity in writing using standard English and following
Harvard guidelines. Minor errors in grammar,

punctuation,
spelling, usage, and/or formatting.

Report is well written and clear using Harvard guidelines
and standard English characterized by strong writing style. It is  free from grammar, punctuation, spelling,
usage, or formatting errors.

 

 

Assessment 3: Case Study-2 

Due date:

Week 12

Group/individual:

Group (max 3
students)

Word count / Time
provided:

3000 words

Weighting:

30%

Unit Learning
Outcomes:

ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5

 

Assessment Details:

Read the case study and the article below, then complete the report requirements at the end. To answer the report requirements provided, you will need to conduct further research about the topic (read the article below see the list of references included for further research).

Case Study

CyberTaxi

CyberTaxi is a transportation service that was rolled out in 200X after its founder, Raydon Karr couldn’t get a taxi in New York during a snowstorm one December night. It originated from the idea, “What if you could request a ride from your phone?”  

Today, CyberTaxi boasts an annual revenue of over $11 billion, a market capitalisation rate of $80 billion, and over 20,000 employees. With 100 million global customers and three million dedicated drivers in 80 countries, CyberTaxi has been a legitimate game-changer in the taxi services market.

CyberTaxi wanted to make it easy as 1-2-3 to get a ride. Customers just need to do is to open their mobile phone, tap a button, and find an affordable ride in minutes. This is aligned to the company’s vision and mission which is to “getting a ride is as easy as saying 1-2-3” and ”to be the number one taxi service for travellers all over the world.” To achieve their vision, they need to align their business strategy with their IT strategy. But how?

 

What CyberTaxi has exposed is that companies can transform a business if they engage with customers more effectively. But getting that engagement is tough. According to Mack Cartrip, chief systems architect for CyberTaxi, “Each person connecting to CyberTaxi is having a unique experience with highly personalised data.” To solve this problem, the company decided to implement a “Customer Relationship Management” or CRM. It’s called CRM software because there is systematic data collection and organisation and uses this information to predict customer’s buying behaviour and habits. It focuses on analysing customer data, anticipating their wishes or requirements, finding new needs, and recovering those who have left. In the same way, it works to make a positive change in profitability, with the increase in sales through personalised campaigns. 

 

Businesses that began to systematise their operations with this type of system retain their customers since there is a balanced collaboration between marketing, customer service and sales. They have also managed to expand their business, increasing their sales in an approximate range of 37%. CRM makes data collection an intuitive process that determines when a lead needs a service or when it’s appropriate to launch a promotion. Another benefit of CRM is that the conversations generated are always personalised, relevant, and up to date producing a 45% increase in customer satisfaction. 

 

CRM systems offer a range of capabilities that helped CyberTaxi to effectively manage their operations and customer interactions. Some of the key capabilities include:

•        Customer data tracking and analysis: CRM was used to track customer data such as pick-up and drop-off locations, ride history, and contact information, allowing them to gain a better understanding of their customers’ needs and preferences.

•        Dispatch and scheduling: CRM are integrated with GPS and mapping technology, allowing CyberTaxi to schedule and dispatch drivers in real-time, improving efficiency and reducing wait times for customers.

•        Payment and billing: CRM are integrated with payment platforms, allowing CyberTaxi to easily process payments and generate invoices for customers.

•        Customer communication: CRM allow CyberTaxi to centralise customer communication, making it easy to respond to customer inquiries and resolve any issues that may arise. They can monitor tweets to find out their customers’ experience regarding their journeys, delays, and so on. They then identify negative tweets and does what’s necessary to remedy the situation. By publicly addressing these issues and offering solutions, it helps them build good customer relations.

•        Reporting and analytics: CRM provide detailed reports and analytics on customer interactions, rides, and revenue, allowing transportation companies to gain insights and make data-driven decisions. For example, prescriptive analytics can be used to maximize an CyberTaxi’s profit. This type of analytics is used to build an algorithm that will automatically adjust the taxi fares based on numerous factors, including customer demand, weather, destination, holiday seasons, and petrol prices.

 

By utilising these capabilities, CyberTaxi can improve their customer relationships, streamline operations, increase revenue, and gain a competitive advantage in the transportation industry.

 

“Another challenge is that CyberTaxi cannot afford a system failure. Ever,” said Cartrip. “If a CyberTaxi customer cannot get an CyberTaxi car, then they will switch to another app. There is no brand loyalty. The systems must always work.”

Cartrip lists three key areas that CyberTaxi needs for a fully redundant system:

•        Performance: What types of tests do you run to ensure that your systems keep running?

•        Data: How can data operate in an environment where a data connection is intermittent?

•        Future proofing: What technologies does CyberTaxi invest in to improve efficiencies in its systems?

A common thread through all of CyberTaxi ‘s systems is performance, performance, and performance. Each technology is chosen because it is the most stable and delivers the fastest response.  In addition to this, CyberTaxi looks to ensure that tools work independently of each other and are destructible. To this end, CyberTaxi actively attempts to crash its systems, including networks, databases, and APIs. The system must work even when it is down. 

The level of performance does not stop at the server. The communication channel, or RPC, is also modified. CyberTaxi’s version is called TChannel. It is based on Twitter’s multiplex RPC protocol, Mux.  CyberTaxi needed to invent its own RPC communication channel because it supports more languages than Twitter. Cartip added, “We are even looking to replace HTTP+JSON, a typical REST API, with Thrift, as our tests are showing that it is 20 times faster. We need all the speed we can get.”

Performance for CyberTaxi goes to extremes with data. The typical data structure for a company is a relational database. The problem that CyberTaxi sees with relational databases is that the whole system can come down if the database is not available.  CyberTaxi uses Big Data tools and techniques as a foundation for its technologies, with tools such as Hadoop, MongoDB, Talend, Cassandra, STORM, Kafka, Spark, and MySQL. Also, the company is extending MySQL with its distributed column store to orchestrate the data processes.

They also use Analytics as a business intelligence solution to help them understand their business, make informed decisions, and measure the impact of the changes they make. Analytics shows what’s working and what’s not, from start to finish, across the entire business, all in real time. They will analyse several different factors, such as population, demographics, location, and more. With visualization tools like Tableau, Big Data analysts at CyberTaxi can produce graphic visualisations of the analysis. In the past, they use Excel to uncover opportunities in the business, but extracting data can be difficult as can drawing meaningful conclusions. Also, Excel data focuses on what has happened in the past…it’s like looking in the rear-view mirror. With business intelligence, processing of this big data is in real- time, gaining instant awareness and act when it matters most. For example, Analytics provides several insights to the drivers by showing them exactly which zones are underserved and offer the greatest opportunity to increase their earnings. Analytics also help them detect, anticipate, and respond to opportunities to engage customers anytime, anywhere. It allows them to deliver targeted promotions to customers based on booking volume, location, time since last booking or to reward (or encourage) loyalty. They can personalise their promotions based on situational awareness by including reference to past and present customer behaviour and events. For example, as a customer completes their journey home on a Friday evening, there’s a good chance they will require a taxi home later on the weekend as they go out with friends. So instead of sending a standard ‘thank you’ text, the system sends them a $3 off voucher code that’s only valid that weekend – ensuring they choose CyberTaxi fleet later. With Analytics the firm was able to segment their customer base not only by the regularity of their bookings, but to cross-reference that with those who had not booked via app. The promotional text was therefore two-fold in its intention – it both rewarded loyalty and offered a link to download the company’s app… which in turn led to more repeat bookings from those customers at a volume greater than before AND those bookings were now automated via the app.

CyberTaxi uses drivers’ phones as the method of distributing data, achieving a kind of “super distributed computing.”  The result is that stress on replicating data is eliminated from the data centres. The trick is achieved by the phone checking in with a server every four seconds to receive an encrypted digest. If a server does not respond, the phone moves to a new server. The whole data environment is redundant. Also, the more drivers, the more redundancy is added to the system.

In addition to the core supply-and-demand dispatch systems, CyberTaxi does have a third system: Disco. Cartrio said, “Disco is the dispatch optimisation system. Disco’s main function is to match supply with demand. Disco, however, allows CyberTaxi to investigate the future. We can match predictive supply and demand, whereas our old system could only match what we knew then.” The advantage Disco provides CyberTaxi is clear: Through data, CyberTaxi can help busy drivers keep efficiently picking up riders. To do this, CyberTaxi needs a global index that requires a massive amount of data: over 1 million writes per second.  CyberTaxi is using Google’s S2 Geometry Library to break down the data and get it out. This library is designed to split data into smaller geographical sections. The result is that each section is not handling only the writes for that geographical location. This in turns helps the company send drivers rapid updates on where riders are located and provide more accurate ETAs for trips. It also gives CyberTaxi the opportunity to expand its business into a specific geography.

You Tasks:

After reading the case study above and conducting further research, you now need to answer the following research requirements below.

1.      Critique the alignment between CyberTaxi’s information systems strategy and business strategy.

a.      Identify the strategic vision and mission of the company

b.      Identify the IT solutions they use to manage their operations (e.g., CRM, Business

Intelligence (BI), etc)

c.      Answer the question, “Are they able to meet their strategic vision using their current IT solutions?” Why? Why not? Justify your answer.

2.      Critically review the role of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting business decision making at CyberTaxi.

a.      Describe how they are using their current BI tools to make business decisions (e.g., Analytics, Tableau).

b.      Answer the question, “Are they able to make good data-driven decisions using Analytics and their BI tool?” Why? Why not? Justify your answer.

3.      Review and evaluate contemporary tools and techniques for accessing information from databases to improve business performance (e.g., Hadoop, Spark, Cassandra, MongoDB, STORM, etc)

4.      A report of 3000 words summarising your analysis must be submitted by the due date. Reasonable assumptions are allowed.

Penalty for Late submission: a deduction of 5% of the total mark shall be imposed on each of the next subsequent days. 

Submission requirements

1.      Use a typical report structure, with a Cover Page, Table of Contents, Executive Summary, Introduction, Body, Recommendation/Conclusion and References format. Since this is a group project made up of a maximum of 3 people, you need to allocate sections of the report to a specific group member and should be clearly identified in the report. You will be given separate marks based on how well you contributed to your allocated research area. For example:

 

Report section

Mark
allocation

Person responsible

Executive

Summary/Introduction/Conclusion

10 marks

All group members

Critique of alignment between CyberTaxi’s information systems strategy and business strategy

20 marks

{Name of group member}

Critical review of the role of business intelligence and
business analytics in supporting business decision making at

CyberTaxi

20 marks

{Name of group member}

Review and evaluate contemporary tools and techniques for
accessing information from databases to improve business performance

20 marks

{Name of group member}

 

2.      The Executive Summary and the References are excluded in the word count.

3.      The Cover Page should clearly indicate the names of each person in the group and the word count.

4.      You can use task above as Headings in the Body of your report, and after the question is the name of the group member(s) who discussed that topic. For example, “Alignment between CyberTaxi’s information systems strategy and business strategy” by Jaspreet Singh.

5.      All References should reflect quality citations from relevant academic journals and adhere to the correct Harvard format (Wikipedia NOT allowed). If you want to get the maximum marks in referencing, you must correctly follow the correct standard format (Harvard) and must provide at least 5 journal references. 

6.      This is how I will mark the Writing Quality & Adherence to Format Guidelines:

Report is well written and clear and standard English
characterized by strong writing style

5 marks

Used correct Harvard guidelines and at least 5 journal
references

5 marks

Free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or
formatting errors

5 marks

 

Marking Information: The Case study-2 will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark.

Marking rubric:

Marking

Criteria

Not satisfactory

(0-49%) of the criterion mark

Satisfactory

(50-64%) of the criterion mark

Good

(65-74%) of the criterion mark

Very Good

(75-84%) of the criterion mark

Excellent

(85-100%)
of the criterion mark

Introduction  about the case
study

 

 

 

 

 

(10 marks) 

Introduction
is presented poorly without adequate details.

Introduction
is presented briefly with some relevance and missing elements such as summary
of case objectives, and problem/ report outline.

Introduction is presented
with adequate details, however missing one or more elements such as summary
of case objectives, and problem/report outline.

 

Introduction
is well written with clear discussion about the summary of case objectives,
problem/ report outline.

Introduction
is very well written with very clear background and discussion about the
summary of case objectives, and problem/report outline.

Content

Critical analysis of the
alignment of an organisation’s information systems strategy and business

strategy

 

(20 marks)

Does not
clearly state an argument or point of view or else little or no supporting
reasoning or evidence is presented. 

States an
argument or point of view but does not present the evidence or reasons in a
logically adequate way.  

States an argument or point of view but
expected to be

organized
more

logically.
Analysis of the problem situation is so far reasonable. 

Presents an argument using evidence and /or
logical reasoning in support of a point of view with satisfactory

level of
critical analysis skills.

Develops a clearly
articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical reasoning with
high level of critical analysis skills.

 

Content

Critically review the role
of business intelligence and business analytics in supporting business
decision

making

 

(20 marks)

 

Does not
clearly state an argument or point of view or else little or no supporting
reasoning or evidence is presented. 

States an
argument or point of view but does not present the evidence or reasons in a
logically adequate way.  

States an argument or point of view but
expected to be organized more

logically.
Analysis of the problem situation is so far reasonable. 

Presents an argument using
evidence and /or logical reasoning in support of a point of view with
satisfactory

level of
critical analysis skills.

Develops a clearly articulated argument,
using evidence and/or systematic logical

reasoning
with high level of critical analysis skills.

Content Review and evaluate contemporary tools and techniques for accessing
information from databases to improve business

performance  

 

(20 marks)

 

Does not
clearly state an argument or point of view or else little or no supporting
reasoning or evidence is presented. 

States an
argument or point of view but does not present the evidence or reasons in a
logically adequate way.  

States an argument or point of view but
expected to be

organized
more

logically.
Analysis of the problem situation is so far reasonable. 

Presents an argument using evidence and /or
logical reasoning in support of a point of view with satisfactory

level of
critical analysis skills.

Develops a
clearly articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical
reasoning with high level of critical analysis skills.

Structure and organization How
logically arguments are stated and how

Does not
clearly state an argument or point of view or else little or no supporting
reasoning or evidence is presented.

States an
argument or point of view but does not organize the evidence or reasons in a
logically adequate way. Analysis of the

States an argument or point of view but
expected to be organized more

logically.
Analysis of

Presents
an argument using evidence and /or logical reasoning in support of a point of
view. Problem situation is analysed

Develops a
clearly articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical
reasoning in support of a conclusion or

critically problems are analysed

 

(15%)

Problem situation is not critically analysed.

problem situation is not that satisfactory. 

the
problem situation is so far reasonable. 

with satisfactory level of critical analysis skills.

point of view. The way problem
situation is

analysed
requires high

level of
critical analysis skills.

Writing
Quality &

Adherence
to

Format
Guidelines

 

(15%)

Report shows a below average/poor writing
style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English and following
proper Harvard guidelines. Frequent

errors in spelling, grammar,
punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting.

 

Report
shows below average and/or casual writing style using standard English and
following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or formatting.

Report
shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English and
following Harvard guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation,
usage, and/or formatting.

Report shows above average writing style and clarity in
writing using standard English and following Harvard guidelines. Minor errors
in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting.

Report is
well written and clear using Harvard guidelines and standard English
characterized by strong writing style. It is free from grammar, punctuation,
spelling, usage, or formatting errors.

Scroll to Top