Module 2: Overview of Evidence-Based Practice Process and Translation

Doctor of Nursing Practice students strengthen evidence-based practice competency when they critically evaluate peer-reviewed research articles and clearly explain study purpose, methodology, and contributions to clinical knowledge.

Instructions

As a DNP scholar, you are expected to perform an academic search of scholarly peer-review journal articles on a given topic. Scholarly inquiry at the doctoral level emphasizes careful source selection, relevance to practice, and critical appraisal skills.

For this assignment, you will choose an article from a peer-review journal database, including but not limited to CINAHL, MEDLINE, Pub MED, NIH, Google Scholar, and AGM Virtual Library. Selecting databases commonly used in advanced nursing practice helps ensure access to high-quality and clinically applicable research.

Once you have your article, you will read and analyze the document and be able to answer the following questions. Thoughtful analysis demonstrates your ability to interpret research findings and connect them to evidence-based practice.

What is the purpose of the study?
What type of methodology the researcher utilizes and why?
How do the results of the study contribute to the research question?

Clear and organized responses to each question support logical reasoning and scholarly communication.

Formatting and Writing Expectations

Use an Essay Format. Academic essay structure supports clarity, coherence, and professional presentation.

You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.
Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax). Careful proofreading reflects professional standards expected in doctoral-level writing.
Your work must be original and not contain material copied from books or the internet. Original analysis demonstrates ethical scholarship and intellectual growth.
When citing the work of other authors, including citations and references, use APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.
Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. Sustained analysis allows for deeper engagement with research concepts and findings.

It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA. Using multiple scholarly sources strengthens credibility and depth of discussion.

Rubric for Case Study

Learning Outcome: Critical Thinking and Logical Reasoning (40 points)

Development of Ideas

Excellent (40 to >36 pts): The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

Good (36 to >32 pts): The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

Fair (32 to >28 pts): The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

Poor (28 to >24 pts): The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

Unacceptable (24 to >0 pts): The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

Learning Outcome: Content Mastery (25 points)

Performance levels remain unchanged and emphasize theoretical application and depth of understanding. Consistent alignment with course concepts supports advanced practice learning.

Learning Outcome: Information Literacy (15 points)

Evaluation focuses on relevance, credibility, and currency of sources. Information literacy is essential for evidence-based decision making in healthcare.

Learning Outcome: Writing Mechanics and APA (10 points)

Professional writing quality reflects attention to detail and scholarly discipline.

Learning Outcome: Format and Organization (10 points)

Clear structure and professional presentation support readability and academic standards.

Total Points: 100

The selected peer-reviewed study examines how evidence-based practice interventions improve patient outcomes in acute care settings. The primary purpose of the research is to evaluate whether structured EBP implementation leads to measurable improvements in clinical decision making. A quantitative methodology is used to analyze outcome data because numerical measures allow for objective comparison across patient populations. Study findings demonstrate statistically significant improvements that directly address the research question. These results support broader adoption of evidence-based practice models in advanced nursing roles. Research on EBP translation emphasizes that clinician engagement and methodological rigor are central to successful implementation (Melnyk et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12329).

References

Melnyk, B.M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L.E. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12329

Stevens, K.R. (2020). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 25(2). https://ojin.nursingworld.org

Leach, M.J. & Gillham, D. (2022). Evaluation of evidence-based practice implementation in clinical settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(4), 1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15083

Saunders, H., Gallagher-Ford, L., Kvist, T. & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2019). Practicing healthcare professionals’ evidence-based practice competencies. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12363

The post DNP evidence based practice article analysis appeared first on EssayBishops.