Assessment 2 Brief
Unit Code and Title: BUS607 Globalisation and Value Chain Management
Assessment 2- Global Case Analysis – SCM
| Assessment 2: Global Case analysis – SCM (Group assessment) | 20% written report plus 10% presentation (in-class) | Week 7 | 2500 words (or equivalent) + 15 mins group presentation |
Part A: Written Report (20 marks)
Context/Description:
Case studies have been provided with Global SCM (Supply Chain Management)scenarios. Students are to use the case study analysis method to answer questions related to the case(s). Students need to demonstrate not only the required set questions in each case but also provide analysis and recommendations.Students need to use contemporary contextual aspects related to the respective case scenario(s).
Selected case study(ies) for each group will be made available on BUS607 Moodle site under the Assessment-3 brief. Students are required to identify, assess, and critically evaluate the required questions provided relating to the case along with extended contemporary analyses and recommendations. Students must use additional sources and references to support the case analyses. Use in-text referencing and a reference list.
The written report is due to be submitted by Sunday end of Week 7, 11:59 pm. This is to be submitted via the Turnitin similarity-checking link.
Instruction on group member’s contribution:
All group members are expected to contribute equally to completing the group tasks. All things being equal, therefore, all members of the group would get the same mark for the group reports. There will be a group self-select link on the Moodle page.
Part B: Presentation(Weighting 10 marks)
The group presentation is in the form of a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 PowerPoint slides. This is a mix of visual representations of contents, data, and images to build an argument on the required analysis and critical evaluations of the selected case scenarios.
The group will consist of Maximum of 4 members. To form the groups, students can self-select the group by using Moodle facility. The 15-20 minutes presentations will be presented by students using the PowerPoint in-class.
Feedback
Marks and feedback with comments will be provided to students. These will be made in Turnitin. Rubrics will be provided for both written reports and presentations providing marking criteria. This will be used to mark and provide feedback to students.
Note: For all the requirements of submissions and integrity policies you must refer to the unit study guide provided for BUS607. Please check on MyPIA Moodle site.
Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric
| Criteria | Fail (F) | Pass (P) | Credit (C) | Distinction (D) | High Distinction (HD) |
|
Conceptual Knowledge: 25%
|
Demonstrates poor knowledge & understanding of the key concepts associated with the given case. | Demonstrates limited knowledge & understanding of the key concepts associated with the given case. | Demonstrates some knowledge & understanding of the key concepts associated with the given case. | Demonstrates sufficient knowledge & understanding of the key concepts associated with the given case. | Demonstrates thorough knowledge & understanding of the key concepts associated with the given case. |
|
Content analysis: 40%
|
Presents a poor analysis of all identified issues and is unable to apply or relate relevant concepts to the case/tasks. | Presents a limited analysis of some identified issues and able to apply or relate relevant concepts to the case/tasks. | Presents some analysis of identified issues and able to apply or relate relevant concepts to the case/tasks. | Presents a thorough analysis of most identified issues and can apply or relate relevant concepts or the case/tasks. | Presents an insightful & thorough analysis of all identified issues and can apply or relate relevant concepts to the case /tasks. |
|
Language and structure: 25%
|
Inadequate. Writing is not up to academic standards; unfocused, disjointed orcontains serious errors. | Adequate. Readable but contains many grammar and spelling errors. | Good. Some grammar and spelling errors. Writing lacks some clarity. | Very good. Writing is nearly free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear presentation of ideas | Excellent. Demonstrates clarity, conciseness, and correctness. Writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. |
|
Referencing: 10%
|
No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistentand technically incorrect. No or minimal referencelist, mixed styles. No intext citations. | Basic and sound attempt to reference sources; may be someinconsistencies and technical errors in style. The reference list isgenerally complete with 1 or 2 references missing. | Good attempt to reference sources,inconsistencies, and technical errorsin style. Few inaccuracies in the reference list and all references listed. |
Very good attempt to reference sources, very minor inconsistencies, and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. |
Professional level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and allreferences listed |