Workplace Diversity & Allyship in Singapore – HRM358

HRM358: Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace

Question 1

Discuss the challenges faced by Alex in the cases. Critically examine the current legal provisions for LGBTQ+ individuals in Singapore, with particular focus on transgender rights and workplace protections. In your answer, evaluate how the active allyship model can be applied by individuals, organizations, and society to support greater inclusion and equity for the LGBTQ+ community.

Grading Criteria Description Marks
ChallengesFaced by Alex Clearly articulate Alex’s challenges and connect it insightfully to broader LGBTQ+ issues and legal provisions in Singapore. 20
Application of Allyship model to Alex’s case You will be graded on how well you explain the allyship model and apply it to Alex’s case from an individual, organisational and societal perspective. 25
Language and References Language and references are an assessable component of this ECALanguage: It is important that you write clearly, using correct grammar, punctuation and spelling. Referencing: The information in the recommended textbooks is limited and you will find it necessary to refer to other sources in order to add depth to your answers.There must be citations of relevant theoretical and empirical evidence to support your answers, with a minimum of 3 references listed accurately in APA format required for this paper. These references should be based on your additional research. Cite at least THREE journal articles or book chapters (excluding the textbook and study guide).Follow the APA7 format as described and shown in class. Appropriate in-text citations and an accurately 5
  formatted Reference section are expected. More information about formatting in APA7 can be found in the APA website:http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspxExample:ReferencesCollins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreadingactivation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 82(6), 407– 428.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.  

(50 marks)

Question 2

Write a personal failure/setback case on an issue related to diversity in the workplace. The setback may include but not limited to use of harmful phrases, misjudging colleagues’ work ethic, having a limited understanding of diversity, an inclusive action that met with resistance etc.)

Using at least THREE (3) concepts learned from the course, relate how the course content has shaped your thinking about this issue. How would you use what you’ve learned to improve yourself and others?

Grading Criteria Description Marks
Use of Evidence. Connect evidence from course materials (i.e., readings, lecture) and lived experience (failure case) to each other. The case should be clearly written and incorporate concepts that we have covered in the course. You should be able to identify which concepts apply or do not apply to your personal diversity failure case. 25
Application of learning to self and others. You will be graded on how well you apply thelearnings from this reflection in the development of yourself and others. 20
Language and References Language and references are an assessable component of this ECALanguage: It is important that you write clearly, using correct grammar, punctuation and spelling.Referencing: The information in the recommended textbooks is limited and you will find it necessary to refer to other sources in order to add depth to your answers.There must be citations of relevant theoretical and empirical evidence to support your answers, with a minimum of 3 references listed accurately in APA format required for this paper. These references should be based on your additional research. Cite at least THREE journal articles or book chapters (excluding the textbook and study guide).Follow the APA7 format as described and shown in class. Appropriate in-text citations and an accurately formatted Reference section are expected. More information about formatting in APA7 can be found in the APA website:http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspxExample:ReferencesCollins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.82.6.407Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed:Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.Basic Books.

Want Help Structuring Your Answers!!

Native Singaporean Experts

All Subjects Covered

Professional Guidance

Get HRM Assignment Help

HRM Assignment Answers: Expert Answers on Above Diversity and Inclusion Questions

Challenges and allyship application

Challenges faced by Alex: In the given case scenario, Alex being a transgender employee faces challenges in the form of biasness and lack of workplace inclusion. The protection of transgender individuals is very limited in Singapore despite significant progress achieved in the form of repeal of section 377A in 2022. The case study of Alex also indicates the struggles faced because of HR policies not aligned properly with gender identity.
Legal context: From a legal point of view, the employment act in Singapore provides protection to workers but there is no specific coverage for sexual orientation or gender identity. However, merit based employment is promoted by the Tripartite guidelines on fair employment practices, but its implementation totally depends on the culture followed within the organisation.

Applying the active allyship model

According to this model, the employees at individual level can practice empathy, and intervene while witnessing any kind of discrimination. At the organisational level, the exam managers can introduce policies like diversity and inclusion training and also set up employee resource groups. At the societal level, that can be the consideration of awareness campaigns to promote understanding and reduce structural marginalisation.
Evaluation: This model is quite effective in transforming awareness into action and thereby encourages psychological safety and systemic inclusion for LGBTQ employees like Alex.

Personal diversity setback and reflection

Failure case: I have misunderstood the communication style of one of my colleagues and believed it to be a disengagement, but I forget to understand the actual reason which is cultural differences in assertiveness. As a result of this, it has created an environment full of tension and clearly indicated my limited awareness of workplace diversity.
Key concepts applied: The key concepts as applied in the above scenario is unconscious bias showing how it can impact perceptions and team work, cultural intelligence reflecting the need for cultural norms in bridging communication gaps and inclusive leadership to promote trust and collaboration.

Personal growth

The HRM358 course has resulted in significant development of my understanding about diversity and the need for inclusion in decision making. I will definitely reflect on the situation before judging behaviour through a cultural lens, and always follow inclusive communication norms. Considering these changes will help me in building a psychological safe and equitable workplace. 

Want a Full Worked Out Answer with References?

Submit Your Request Here

Check Samples on HRM Assignment Written by Experts

Adrian Lee
www.assignmenthelpsingapore.sg

The post Workplace Diversity & Allyship in Singapore – HRM358 appeared first on Assignment Help Singapore.