Research a bit on Amelia Lanyer as a possible author of Shakespeare’s works (this is a good place to start).


Read

1. “Gender Relations”

2. Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum

3. “Selected Writings” by Margaret Cavendish

4. “Selected Poems” by Katherine Philips

Discussion 7: Many Lives, Many Masters

Suzannah Lipscomb, in the  video link  https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=33&v=BkyVsHw34-k&feature=emb_title , gives a brief overview of the way women, and women’s bodies, were perceived during the Middle Ages and Early Modern period. In what way does what she is saying in the video connect with the texts you have read so far in the course (including “Gender Relations”)? How might this perception have affected the writing style and voice of the authors you will be reading in this module? After you have answered these general questions, choose one of the following to respond to as well:

1. Joseph Swetnam’s Arraignment provoked the response by Rachel Speght in Muzzle. Summarize and evaluate each argument for its rhetorical effectiveness (in terms of ethos, logos, and pathos). Who is the audience? Which was more effective and why?

2. William Gouge’s manual Of Domesticall Duties is a “conduct book” common to the Tudor and Stuart periods; in this case, offering advice for marital life. What is Gouge’s main argument and is it well-supported? What does this text tell us about the evolving institution of marriage and the role of women in 17th century England?

Discussion 8: Women at the Margins

The four women whose writings you have read this module (Speght, Lanyer, Cavendish and Philips) are all writing in very different styles and genres. Does anything bind their works together? Is there the suggestion of a common experience here? In terms of critical acclaim, Katherine Philips was the most respected of these writers among her contemporaries – why do you think this is?  What, if anything, makes her poems different from others in this module? After answering these general questions, please select two from the list below:

1. Research a bit on Amelia Lanyer as a possible author of Shakespeare’s works (this is a good place to start). What evidence points to this possibility? Do you find it convincing? Why/why not?

2. Margaret Cavendish was undoubtedly an eccentric and flamboyant figure of her day; did this detract from her writings or is this the very reason we remember her today?

3. Katherine Philips’ “A Married State” humorously praises the life of the unmarried (she reportedly wrote it at age 14), “The Double Marriage of King Charles” is a political assault on anti-royalists, while her poems to Hector are testaments to the pain of child loss which was quite common in her day. Where is she most effective – as a satirist, polemicist or memoirist?

Read

1. “Contexts: The Wider World” by various writers

2. Oroonoko by Aphra Behn

3. Gulliver’s Travels (PartI, “A Voyage to Lilliput” and Part IV, “A Voyage to the Country of the Houyhnhnms”) by Jonathan Swift

4.  The Interesting Narrative of the Life by Olaudah Equiano

5. Writing Project 3: Assignment

Discussion 9: The Wider World

After reading the “Contexts: The Wider World,” which of the texts seems the most important and why? How are the descriptions of other cultures influenced by English society/customs and expectations? What stereotypes seem prevalent here? Which do you think still live with us today? After answering these general questions, please select at least 3 from the list below:

1. What is Richard Hakluyt’s purpose in assembling and editing The Principle Navigations? What arguments does he make to support this purpose?

2. In The Geographical History of Africa, Leo Africanus describes the negative and positive attributions of North Africans (“Barberie”) – what are these? In what ways are his depictions of Africans still relevant today?

3. Thomas Hariot’s Report on Virginia has been described as a “complex, unsettling Elizabethan travel narrative.” What about it is “unsettling” and what about it is “complex”?

4. Michel de Montaigne’s essay “On Cannibals” is considered to be one of the first arguments based on the idea of “Cultural Relativism” (click for a definition). In what ways is this so and do you agree with his argument? Why/why not?

5. Why do you think Rowlandson’s work accepted for publication even though it was unusual for women to be permitted publication in Puritan New England?

Discussion 10: Reckoning with the Past and Imagining the Future

After completing all the readings for this module, what, in your opinion, is the most important legacy of British colonialism? Which of the major three readings (by Behn, Swift and Equiano) was the most significant to you and why? Finally, as this is our last discussion, which of the readings this semester has been the most relevant or meaningful to you and why?

Read

1.

Gender

Relations

2.

Salve

Deus

Rex

Judaeoru

m

3.

Selected

Writings

by

Margaret

Cavendis

h

4.

Selected

Poems

by

Kat

herine

Philip

s

Discussion

7:

Many

Lives,

Many

Masters

Suzannah

Lipscomb,

in

the

video

link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=33&v=BkyVsHw34

k&feature=emb_title

,

gives

a

brief

overview

of

the

way

women,

and

women’s

bodies,

were

perceived

during

the

Middle

Ages

and

Early

Modern

period.

In

what

way

does

what

she

is

saying

in

the

video

connect

with

the

texts

you

have

read

so

far

in

the

course

(including

“Gender

Relations”)?

How

might

this

perception

have

affected

the

writing

style

and

voice

of

the

authors

you

will

be

reading

in

this

module?

After

you

have

answered

these

general

questions,

choose

one

of

the

following

to

respond

to

as

well:

1.

Joseph

Swetnam’s

Arr

aignment

provoked

the

response

by

Rachel

Speght

in

Muzzle

.

Summarize

and

evaluate

each

argument

for

its

rhetorical

effectiveness

(in

terms

of

ethos,

logos,

and

pathos).

Who

is

the

audience?

Which

was

more

effective

and

why?

2.

William

Gouge’s

manual

Of

Dom

esticall

Duties

is

a

“conduct

book”

common

to

the

Tudor

and

Stuart

periods;

in

this

case,

offering

advice

for

marital

life.

What

is

Gouge’s

main

argument

and

is

it

well

supported?

What

does

this

text

tell

us

about

the

evolving

institution

of

marriage

and

the

role

of

wome

n

in

17th

century

England?

Discussion

8:

Women

at

the

Margins

The

four

women

whose

writings

you

have

read

this

m

odule

(Speght,

Lanyer,

Cavendish

and

Philips)

are

all

writing

in

very

different

styles

and

genres.

Does

anything

bind

their

works

together?

Is

there

the

suggestion

of

a

common

experience

here?

In

terms

of

critical

acclaim,

Katherine

Philips

was

the

most

re

spected

of

these

writers

among

her

contemporaries

why

do

you

think

this

is?

What,

if

anything,

makes

her

poems

different

from

others

in

this

module?

After

answering

these

general

questions,

please

select

two

from

the

list

below:

1.

Research

a

b

it

on

Amelia

Lanyer

as

a

possible

author

of

Shakespeare’s

works

(

this

is

a

good

place

to

start).

What

evidence

points

to

this

possibility

?

Do

you

find

it

convincing?

Why/why

not?

2.

Margaret

Cavendish

was

undoubtedly

an

eccentric

and

flamboyant

figure

of

her

day;

did

this

detract

from

her

writings

or

is

this

the

very

reason

we

remember

her

today?

3.

Katherine

Philips’

“A

Married

State”

humorously

praises

the

life

of

the

unmarried

(she

reportedly

wrote

it

at

age

14),

“The

Double

Marriage

of

King

Charles”

is

a

political

assault

on

anti

royalists,

while

her

poems

to

Hector

are

testaments

to

the

pain

o

f

child

loss

which

was

quite

common

in

her

day.

Where

is

she

most

effective

as

a

satirist,

polemicist

or

memoirist?

Read

1. “Gender Relations”

2. Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum

3. “Selected Writings” by Margaret Cavendish

4. “Selected Poems” by Katherine Philips

Discussion 7: Many Lives, Many Masters

Suzannah Lipscomb, in the video

link https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=33&v=BkyVsHw34-k&feature=emb_title,

gives a brief overview of the way women, and women’s bodies, were perceived during the

Middle Ages and Early Modern period. In what way does what she is saying in the video

connect with the texts you have read so far in the course (including “Gender Relations”)?

How might this perception have affected the writing style and voice of the authors you will

be reading in this module? After you have answered these general questions, choose one of

the following to respond to as well:

1. Joseph Swetnam’s Arraignment provoked the response by Rachel Speght in Muzzle.

Summarize and evaluate each argument for its rhetorical effectiveness (in terms of ethos,

logos, and pathos). Who is the audience? Which was more effective and why?

2. William Gouge’s manual Of Domesticall Duties is a “conduct book” common to the

Tudor and Stuart periods; in this case, offering advice for marital life. What is

Gouge’s main argument and is it well-supported? What does this text tell us about the

evolving institution of marriage and the role of women in 17th century England?

Discussion 8: Women at the Margins

The four women whose writings you have read this module (Speght, Lanyer, Cavendish

and Philips) are all writing in very different styles and genres. Does anything bind their

works together? Is there the suggestion of a common experience here? In terms of critical

acclaim, Katherine Philips was the most respected of these writers among her

contemporaries – why do you think this is? What, if anything, makes her poems different

from others in this module? After answering these general questions, please select two from

the list below:

1. Research a bit on Amelia Lanyer as a possible author of Shakespeare’s works (this is a

good place to start). What evidence points to this possibility? Do you find it convincing?

Why/why not?

2. Margaret Cavendish was undoubtedly an eccentric and flamboyant figure of her day; did

this detract from her writings or is this the very reason we remember her today?

3. Katherine Philips’ “A Married State” humorously praises the life of the unmarried (she

reportedly wrote it at age 14), “The Double Marriage of King Charles” is a political assault

on anti-royalists, while her poems to Hector are testaments to the pain of child loss which

was quite common in her day. Where is she most effective – as a

satirist, polemicist or memoirist?

Blog ArchiveCopyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com Read More
find the cost of your paper

The post Research a bit on Amelia Lanyer as a possible author of Shakespeare’s works (this is a good place to start). appeared first on Best Custom Essay Writing Services | EssayBureau.com.



This essay is written by:

Prof. SirMojo Verified writer

Finished papers: 435

Proficient in:

English, History, Business and Entrepreneurship, Nursing, Psychology, Management

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer
© 2017 theacademicessays. All Rights Reserved. Design & Developed by theacademicessays.
How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay
Loading...