Option #1: My Power to Influence Essay


Critical Thinking Assignment (50 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1:  My Power to Influence Essay

  1. Read the article found here (Links to an external site.).
  2. Write a short essay. Please include the following:
    1. Discuss three bases of individual power from the article (reward, legitimate, etc.) which you find in your workplace or other areas of your life.
    2. Share at least one example of these bases of power are used to influence others. Which of the bases do you find audiences to be most receptive or responsive? Are there any bases of power that you feel could be used in a more positive manner?

The body of this paper should be 3-5 pages in length, not including the Title and References pages and should adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. (Links to an external site.)

Option #2:  My Power to Influence Presentation

  1. Read the article found here (Links to an external site.).
  2. Create an APA-formatted presentation by using PowerPoint, Prezi, Visme, or other presentation software. Please include the following:
    1. Discuss three sources of personal power from the article (expertise, attractiveness, etc.) which you find most effective in your workplace or other areas of your life.
    2. Share at least one example of how your use of each personal power “source” influences others. Do you find your audiences to be receptive to your approaches? Are there any sources that you feel could use some improvement?

Your presentation should adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. (Links to an external site.)

Here are several presentation software links:

Rubric

ORG300 Mod 3 CT

ORG300 Mod 3 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
15.0 to >13.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

13.0 to >10.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

10.0 to >7.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

7.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis
15.0 to >13.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the topic.

13.0 to >10.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10.0 to >7.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

7.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0

 

Have any Question or Comment?

Leave a Reply

Have a similar question?

Ask your homework question

 

Enjoy Our Unique Features!

INDIVIDUAL APPROACH:
Chat with every writer who applies to your request, and view their skills and portfolio. Make the choice that’s right for you.
MANAGE YOUR ORDER:
Monitor progress and see any changes made. Have full control over every phase of the process.
COMMUNICATE:
Ask your writer questions and provide your ideas about your paper. Produce the exact result that you want.
ENJOY THE OUTCOME:
Get everything done on time with high quality. Writing papers is much simpler with us.

Submit Your Instructions to Writers for FREE!!

Ask your homework question

 

© 2017 theacademicessays. All Rights Reserved. Design & Developed by theacademicessays.

POST YOUR QUESTION FOR FREE

Click Here to get instant solution!
X myStickymenu
Loading...