Managing Tour & Hosp Workforce | My Assignment Tutor


AGriffithUNIVERSITY
Rubric 58202
ALEC – RubricBuilder
Rubric Builder
Program Semester Offering
MITHM Trimester 1 2021
Course Code 7205THS Course Title Managing Tour & Hosp Workforce Assessment Task A3 Industry Compendium Assessment Weighting 50
Objective Name
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Criteria
VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1
VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1
VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1
VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1
Format requirements. No cut and paste. Coherent and professional. Use of appropriate academic journal literature and referencing.
VIGNETTE 2 Activity 1
Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 2 problem solving and evaluation 5% Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 3 problem solving and evaluation 5%
Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 4 problem solving and evaluation
5%
Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%
Format requirements. No cut and paste. Coherent and professional. Use of appropriate academic journal literature and referencing.
Personal 4% Employment and Educational Background. Information provided.
Excellent
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well presented professional document.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.
Extremely well presented professional document.
n
Very Good
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Generally well presented professional document.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.
Generally well presented professional document.
n
Good
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Well presented overall with some minor format and presentation elements not followed.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.
Well presented overall with some minor format and presentation elements not followed.
n
Satisfactory
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
Some parts of the document well presented however other parts not following guidelines or difficult to follow..
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
Unsatisfactory
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Very poorly presented and difficult to follow at times due to disorganised presentation. Many guidelines not seeming to be followed.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.
Some parts of the document well presented however other parts not following guidelines or difficult to follow..
n
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.
Very poorly presented and difficult to follow at times due to disorganised presentation. Many guidelines not seeming to be followed.
Personal Employment and Educational Background. Information NOT provided.
https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/alec/index.php?v=print_preview&a=3&rubric_id=58202 1/2

Private and Confidential

Yours all information is private and confidential; it is not shared with any other party. So, no one will know that you have taken help for your Academic paper from us.



This essay is written by:

Prof. Amanda Verified writer

Finished papers: 435

Proficient in:

English, History, Business and Entrepreneurship, Nursing, Psychology, Management

You can get writing help to write an essay on these topics
100% plagiarism-free

Hire This Writer
© 2017 theacademicessays. All Rights Reserved. Design & Developed by theacademicessays.

Ask Your Homework Today!

We have over 1000 academic writers ready and waiting to help you achieve academic success

CLICK HERE TO GET ORIGINAL ANSWERS FROM WRITERS

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?
Loading...