In this activity you will begin the psychological report that you will be building throughout the remainder of the course. Using the Sample Reportas a format guide, construct a psychological report with a referral question, incorporating Frank’s Psychosocial and MSE History in Resources. (do not add any information that is not provided in the history and MSE). For the Test Results section of your report, review and interpret the WAIS protocol that is located under the courses resources tab. Conclude your paper with diagnoses and recommendations.
When discussing the WAIS-IV results, be sure to include a discussion of the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), as well as a full interpretation of index scores. You will need to discuss the client’s strengths and weaknesses with regard to subtest variability.
You are encouraged to review the PowerPoint on the WAIS-IV, which can be found under the course resources tab.
Then on a separate word document continue the previous exercise. Review and interpret the WRAT-4 protocol that is located under the courses Resources tab, and add your previous report. In light of this new information, consider if you want to revise or add to your diagnoses and recommendations.
When discussing the WRAT-4 results, be sure to include a discussion of the WRAT-4 scores in which you would want to present the Standard Scores and percentile ranks for each subtest of the WRAT-4 (Word Reading, Sentence Comprehension, Spelling, Math Computation, and Reading Composite). You do not need to present grade levels. You also want to talk about scores that are out of the normal range and what that might suggest.
You are encouraged to review the PowerPoint on the WRAT-4 as well as the Psychological Test Report Writing, which can be found under the course Resources tab.
Then in a separate word document.
Review and interpret the MMPI-2 protocol that is located under the courses Resources tab, and add this to your previous report. In light of this new information, consider if you want to revise or add to your diagnoses and recommendations. The sample report that is provided for you under the course resources tab is a guide.
When discussing the MMPI-2 results, be sure to include a discussion of the validity scales (you can refer to your text for further guidance). Then interpret/discuss the clinical scales that are clinically significant, which are a T-score of 65 or greater. Your text and the PowerPoint of the MMPI-2 (found under the course resources tab) list interpretive paragraphs of such scores, which you can integrate into your Interpretation Paper.
You are encouraged to review the PowerPoint on the MMPI-2, which can be found under the course resources tab.
Then in a seperate word document.
Begin Psychological Assessment Report. It should be 5-7 pages in length.You will complete the report that you started in Activity 9. Incorporate any feedback that you received from previous submissions. In addition to the tests you have already interpreted (WAIS-IV, WRAT4, and MMPI-2) you will add your interpretation of the MCMI-III. As before, your report will include a reason for referral (may be fictitious), the test results from the WAIS IV, WRAT 4, MMPI-2, and MCMI-III, test interpretation, summary and recommendations, and a brief discussion of the WHODAS 2.0, based on findings that refer to the referral question(s). A description of the content for each of the main sections of your report follows:Identification and Referral· Client’s name, age, marital status, ethnicity, gender. · Describe the setting, including where the testing took place, how the client travelled there (or if you went to the client’s home), if he or she was on time and accompanied by anyone.· Reason for testing at this time, including the referral source (can be a self-referral or a fictitious referrer) and the information sought by the referrer.· Presenting problems and symptoms. There should be one or more referral questions to be answered by your assessment. These questions will be answered in your “Recommendations” section and the answers should flow logically from your findings. Some common referral questions for psychological testing include:· Mental health diagnosis and treatment or management recommendations.· Disability determination – whether the client is able to work and limitations.· Vocational/educational assessment – what kind of work would be a good fit for the client’s abilities.· Learning disability assessment – is a learning disability present and what sort of limitations and accommodations are appropriate.HistoryPreface your history by indicating the source (such as client’s report or family report) and whether you feel it is reliable.Family History. Include information about current family, current living situation and family of origin. Educational and Vocational History. Level of education completed, high school and college grades, any history of special education, expulsions and suspensions, occupation and jobs held, last worked, reason for any dismissals, longest time at the same job, vocational aspirations if relevant.Medical and Mental Health History. The non-psychiatric section should include reports of medical diagnoses and symptoms, current medications, surgeries and overnight hospitalizations, and head injuries. The mental health section should include psychiatric hospitalizations, outpatient mental health treatment, substance abuse treatment, history of psychotropic medication prescriptions, and suicide attempts. When applicable, indicate that there was “no reported history of …” to show that you inquired about the areas above.Antisocial Behavior/Substance Abuse. Age, charge, and outcome of any arrests or other legal problems. Current and past use of alcohol and other recreational drugs, 12-step group attendance. Daily FunctioningClient’s mode of travel (car, bus, family rides) and ability (short trips by car, uses the bus but needs help to get to a new location, etc.). Client’s daily living skills, including ability to groom, bathe, dress, do household chores, and manage money. Include a general description of the client’s daily activities including job, recreational, and social activities.Review of RecordsInclude a brief summary of educational or medical records if available (or indicate that no records were available when the report was completed). Diagnoses and test scores are often particularly helpful, as they provide a baseline for comparison. Records reviewed should include report dates, institution name, and the name of the physician or other professional.Mental Status and Behavioral ObservationsUse the Mental Status Exam form as a guide for your interview. This section can be written or dictated directly from this form. General appearance: Particularly note unusual characteristics that may provide diagnostic information – neglected hygiene, usual dress or tattoos, or physical characteristics that may affect the person’s social interactions and abilities. Attitude & general behavior: Describe the person’s interaction with you and attitude toward being tested and interviewed. Mood and affect: Obtain a quote from the client regarding recent mood. Ask about any history of depression and anxiety. Note the range of the client’s affect. Ask about sleep and appetite, and inquire further about depressive or anxious symptoms if a particular disorder if suspected. See the symptom guide at the bottom of the MSE form. For instance, if PTSD were suspected, you would inquire about symptoms such as nightmares, flashbacks, and startle response. Stream of mental activity: Most clients will be described as responding in a coherent and relevant fashion and speaking at a normal pace with 100% intelligibility. Note any deviations from this, including psychotic symptoms, slower or faster than normal speech, and problems with speech intelligibility. Note unusual speech content and inquire into delusional thinking (paranoid, reference, control, grandiosity) if psychosis is suspected. Sensorium and orientation: You will describe most clients as alert and aware of their surroundings; note any deviations from this. Orientation includes awareness of elements such as person, place, time and situation. Do not say the client was “oriented times three” as the meaning of this is not always consistent and clear. Do report the questions you asked and the client’s responses. For instance, “The client reported the current day of the week as Saturday rather than Monday.” Memory. Use simple tests to assess the client’s long- and short-term memory and report the results of those tests. A useful test of short-term memory is to list three objects, have the client repeat them back, and then ask the client to recall them after five minutes have passed. Fund of information. Two or three questions will give a rough index of the client’s general knowledge. Easy (mental retardation suspected): “How many legs on a dog?” or “Where is your nose?”, Average: “How many days in a year?”, Above average: “What is the boiling temperature of water?” Concentration and attention: Rate the client’s ability to attend to instructions and task persistence. Simple concentration tasks are counting backwards from 20 or, for higher functioning clients, counting backwards from 100 by 7. Note the time required and number of errors. If ADHD is suspected, use the symptom guide at the bottom of the MSE form to inquire further about symptoms. Perceptual distortions: Ask about any history of auditory or visual hallucinations and determine if they were associated with drug use or mood (mania or depression). If there were hallucinations, note their frequency, when they last occurred, and their content. Note if the client appears to be responding to hallucinations. Judgment & insight. Use a simple, standard question to test judgment, such as “What would you do if your neighbor’s house were on fire?” Also, note any history that would indicate impaired judgment, such as arrests or job dismissals. Insight is whether the client has an accurate understanding of his or her mental health status. If there are mental health problems, a client with good insight attributes symptoms to these problems, and is aware of the need for treatment. For instance, a man diagnosed as schizophrenic would demonstrate good insight if he understands that his auditory hallucinations are caused by his illness and that psychiatric medication would help. An alcoholic demonstrates good insight if she admits her illness and recognizes the need to attend AA or other treatment.Test ResultsWhen discussing the WAIS-IV results, be sure to include a discussion of the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), Working Memory Index (WMI) and Processing Speed Index. You will need to discuss the client’s strengths and weaknesses with regard to subtest variability. Refer to the WAIS-IV PowerPoint and the sample report as a guide. Start with the FSIQ, indicate its percentile range and category (Low Average, Superior, etc.). If a change in functioning is suspected due to head injury or other problem, compare the FSIQ to estimated pre-morbid functioning.Compare the VCI to the PRI, and indicate if they are significantly different. Briefly interpret this comparison. If they are not significantly different you can say, “The VCI and PRI were not significantly different from each other, reflecting about equal facility with tasks requiring words as with tasks requiring non-verbal reasoning and performance.” If they are significantly different, indicate why you think this is. Is it consistent with a suspected diagnosis? Does it reflect cultural differences or a physical impairment?When discussing the WRAT4 results, be sure to include a discussion of the WRAT4 scores. Present the Standard Scores and Percentile ranks for each subtest of the WRAT4 (Word Reading, Spelling, Sentence Comprehension, Math Computation). You also want to talk about scores that are out of the normal range and what that might suggest. It is helpful to give examples of the client’s abilities, particularly on Math Computation (i.e., “able to perform arithmetic operations with whole numbers, but unable to work with decimals or fractions”). If a WRAT4 subtest differs significantly from IQ (at least 20 points lower), a diagnosis of learning disorder is likely, unless you feel that the difference is better explained by other factors.When discussing the MMPI-2 results, be sure to include a discussion of the validity scales (you can refer to your text for further guidance). Then interpret/discuss the clinical scales that are clinically significant, which are a T-score of 65 or greater. Your text and the powerpoint of the MMPI-2 (found under the course resources tab) list interpretive paragraphs of such scores.When discussing the MCMI-III results, be sure to include a discussion of the validity scales, which can be assessed by noting the pattern of scores of the validity indicators (you can refer to your text for further guidance). Then interpret/discuss the Personality Disorder Scales that are clinically significant. Note that a BR score of 75-84 suggests the syndrome or pattern is present, whereas scores of 85 or above indicate that it is prominent. Next, interpret/discuss the Clinical Syndrome Scales. Your text lists interpretive paragraphs of such scores. Diagnostic ImpressionsProvide a complete DSM-5 diagnosis to include the WHODAS 2.0 (p. 747 on the DSM-5). Your diagnoses should be clearly supported by the material you have presented to this point. Your assessment is very likely the most thorough psychodiagnostic procedure the client will ever undergo, so it is important that you come to a decision and not expect that another clinician will be better able to do this.Summary · This section should not introduce any new information. It needs to integrate and present an overall picture of the client, in regards to the referral question.· Statement of overall level of functioning, symptoms present, and problems experienced· What is the level of cognitive functioning and capacitiesRecommendations· The most significant and pressing problem should be listed first and should be in the context of the referral question.· Do not make recommendations about issues that are outside the purview of your training and competency. For instance, you would not recommend an imaging study or a specific medication. You might recommend referral to a neurologist or psychiatrist for evaluation and possible treatment.· Make recommendations that take practical and financial limitations into account. It may be tempting to recommend “further testing” because you feel unsure of your recommendations. But keep in mind that testing can be expensive and time consuming. Additional testing should only be recommended if it is for a specific purpose and is necessary for important decision-making.· As much as possible, your recommendations should take your test findings into account and should answer questions that could not have been answered before the assessment was done. You do not need to suggest that the client see a physician because she reported occasional headaches.